The Russian Meeting Place: A place to meet people and talk about all things Russian...

International Discussions about Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Travel, Music, Russian News, Ukrainian culture, Belarusian Dating, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Kiev and other intelligent topics about life in the former Soviet Union.

     


                                

              

Pages: 1

Russian prejudice towards muslims, blacks, others? Skinheads in Russia...

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)


Posted by: Nevsky21

Kashyar,

What nationality are you? I'm very curious you look like you are from the Middle East. How are you getting along with your wife? I'm sure its quite a change from her since now she cant eat pork, drink alchohol, has to see her son get circumcised if you have one. Thats if you are muslim if you arent forget my comments. What I dont understand is why you couldnt find a Middle Eastern woman to marry. I think you would have more in common with her than with a Russian.



Posted by: Pin Boy

time for this equal opportunity offender to be banished

pin boy



Posted by: Khashyar

?

I had to read this post twice

First of all, it doesn't matter what nationality I am.

Secondly, no, I'm not muslim, but it wouldn't matter if I were muslim.

.... I read your post again, and I think that you were being sincere in your questions, but... you presented it in a way that could offend people because you are implying that it makes a difference if people of different nationalities marry and that people from different countries shouldn't marry... I don't have the same beliefs.

Since I was born and raised in America, then with your rational I should marry an American. But, I choose to marry a Russian woman.

(By the way, I am actually a vegetarian, and Lena eats much more meat than I do, but I would not hold that against her and discriminate against her )...

I am going to read some of your other posts that you made in the forum...

It's going to be difficult for you in the U.S. (especially NYC) if you feel hate towards black people and muslims.

I am sure that you don't think that it is fair if Americans believed in stereotypes about Russians and discriminated against them.

Khashyar


Quote:
Originally posted by Nevsky21
Kashyar,

What nationality are you? I'm very curious you look like you are from the Middle East. How are you getting along with your wife? I'm sure its quite a change from her since now she cant eat pork, drink alchohol, has to see her son get circumcised if you have one. Thats if you are muslim if you arent forget my comments. What I dont understand is why you couldnt find a Middle Eastern woman to marry. I think you would have more in common with her than with a Russian.




Posted by: inlove

Khash,
You got yourself a nazi on the forum. But I don't think he deserves a special thread.. "Russian prejustice towards..." sounds to me the same way as "American prejustice towards.."



Posted by: Khashyar

Netsky...

If you want to have a rational and level-headed discussion about prejudice and Russians, or about how Russian people feel about different nationalities, then let's have that here.....

And by the way, I traveled all throughout Russia (across Siberia alone by train), and I did not experience prejudice once for "looking middle eastern."

I also want to ask you what specific experiences made you feel negative towards muslims and African-Americans?

What were the specific experiences, or do you dislike muslims and blacks for another reason?

But, I can have a rational and level-headed discussion about this...

Khashyar



Posted by: Khashyar

Quote:
Originally posted by inlove
Khash,
You got yourself a nazi on the forum. But I don't think he deserves a special thread.. "Russian prejustice against..." sounds to me the same way as "American prejustice against.."


Hi inlove....

If Nevsky is a nazi or skinhead, then I want to understand how he and other skinheads think.

I think that this could be an opportunity to understand how a skinhead thinks...

I actually grew up in Southwest Ohio, where there was a lot of prejudice (the Klu Klux Klan was active there), but I never really say down with a skinhead and just talk about beliefs....

Although I am obviously not a skinhead and enjoy being around different cultures and people, I think that it could be interesting to learn about why skinheads believe what they do...

So, Nevsky...... I sincerely want to hear about why you don't like muslims or African-Americans? (But we have to do this in a thoughtful way that is respectful to others....)

Khashyar



Posted by: inlove

I doubt very much that any thoughtful discussion possible with people of this type. They don't respond to rational thought.. But let's see..



Posted by: Nevsky21

First of all I'm not a skinhead. I support right wing parties such as the RNE in Russia. Even though I dislike America I have some level of respect to various groups in this country( NAtional Alliance, Church of hte Creator, Aryan NAtions to a lesser extent). Another good newer group is White Revolution. The birthrate of whites is declining because social parasites are everywhere. In Russia you got the Chechens, Azeris, Turks. In America you have ******s, mexicans, and muslims to alesser extent. They are taking our jobs and our women. They bring nohting but drugs and AIDS. Very few of them contribute to our white societies. For an example its a fact that in America ******s cause more crime than whites. I know you are goijg ot give me that poverty bul****. I know Russian families who have come to the US and live poorer than ,most blacks. They recieve not wellfair and they still manage to stay in school, get good grades, stay off drugs, etc. This true of most European immigrants in the 1990s to the US. THe jews are a whilo other topic. They have controled the world banks for centuries and lie and cheat their way htrough life. In WWII 20 million Russians died, 6 million Jews died and who got all the compensation and world pity till otday the kikes. They along with WASPS control the US government financially. Ariel Sharon himself admitted that ISrael owns both Houses of the American govcernment. I have a million other things I can say but I'll leave it here.



Posted by: Khashyar

Ok.... I understand a bit more about your opinions and beliefs...

So, you feel that African-Americans, Mexicans and immigrants are taking your jobs and women?

I don't think that ALL that immigrants and African Americans bring are drugs and aids... I think that is as truthful as saying that all that Russians bring is alcohlism and wife-beating.

Or, to say that all that the Europeans (who are actually immigrants in America and who did steal from the American Indians who first lived here) brought to America was Syphilis, small pox, and alcohlism.

There are positive and negative things about all people-- Russians, European Americans, Mexican Americans, etc....

You mentioned that the birthrate of "White" people is declining. Why would it matter if the entire world had a skin color other than "pink."? Populations of animals, plants and human beings always fluctuates. That is just a natural law of nature.

But the real point is that every human being is much more the same than different. A mexican person, for example, has the same emotions as you do. They experience love, happiness, anger, etc. They have a spirituality, may or may not believe in God.

People are people. Some are lazy, some are hard-working. Some white people (especially in the south and midwest) are on welfare. There are many African Americans who are millionaires.

Some of your statements are generalities like: They are "taking our jobs and women." Actually, Europeans have a much easier time finding a good job in America than an African-American does, for example. Regarding the women, I don't see a mass exodus of women of European origin looking for immigrant or African-American men. That's just not accurate or true. It is happening in a small number of cases.

So, I think that it is important to think about whether what you are saying is true. Perhaps there is a small grain of truth to it, but not in a general sense.

I still want to understand where the anger towards these groups come from.

Did you have a difficult time in America- finding a job, adjusting, etc., so you are directing your anger at immigrants and others?

By the way, I used to live in Cleveland, Ohio (where there are many Russians and Ukrainians), and there are some Americans who have a negative stereotype of Russians.

It doesn't mean that the stereotypes of Russians being dishonest and the other stereotypes that exist are true, but some people believe them.

Again, I think that it is important to understand if what you are saying is true, or.... are you accepting these beliefs and stereotypes because it justifies the anger that you feel?

About Jewish people...... Just are there are honest and dishonest
Catholics and Baptists, there are honest and dishonest Jewish people too. It is not the truth or accurate to say that all Jewish people lie and cheat. That is just not the truth. That is too great and untrue a generalization.

Nevsky, I hear that you are feeling angry and somewhat disillusioned. But it is not going to make you feel better to blame others for your bitterness. That is just going to make you feel even more unhappy.

Also... I want to keep all comments about race, etc. in this thread, and not intersperse it in other threads, which takes the other threads off-topic.

I do have a question..... Why do you feel that there is an upsurge of Russian Nationalist groups in Russia at the moment?

Khashyar



Posted by: tanya3475

omg...it's a fact that people like Mr. Nazi just love to air their lame opinions...but everything they say sounds so ridiculous as if they belong to a...hmm...mental institution



Posted by: Khashyar

Hi Tanya,

Yes, I do not agree with Nevsky's philosophy, though I did want to hear his reasoning so that I could better understand how he came to believe what he believes.

I wanted to understand why he believes his judgments are true.

I obviously don't want the forum to be a place to support and give voice to prejudicial hate, but... I think that something can be gained from more understanding.

As I mentioned before, I am curious how the Russian Nationalist groups developed. How did their resentment of foriegners begin?

I think it is good for White Supremists and for non-White Supremists to reflect and understand this.

Khashyar

(I also think that we should confine the discussion of this topic to THIS thread, and leave the other threads for other topics).



Posted by: AkMike

I'm courious why he dislikes the United States? Because of the prosperity we have vs. the problems back in Russia? If he dislikes the US so much why is he here? How many Blacks, Mexicans and such has he ever met on a 1 on 1 situation? Should we still harbor bad feelings towards Russians based on the cold war era?
And the 20 million Russians he said died during WW2... Seems very high to me. But I think that I've read that number were killed by Stalin ( his own countryman) during his 'purges' before, during and after the war. Has he forgotten the aid that the US gave during the war despite the political differences of our countrys?



Posted by: tanya3475

Quote:
Originally posted by AkMike
I'm courious why he dislikes the United States? Because of the prosperity we have vs. the problems back in Russia? If he dislikes the US so much why is he here? How many Blacks, Mexicans and such has he ever met on a 1 on 1 situation? Should we still harbor bad feelings towards Russians based on the cold war era?
And the 20 million Russians he said died during WW2... Seems very high to me. But I think that I've read that number were killed by Stalin ( his own countryman) during his 'purges' before, during and after the war. Has he forgotten the aid that the US gave during the war despite the political differences of our countrys?

LOL...Mike...don't ask him about Stalin...he will reply it happened because Stalin wasn't Russian (he was from Georgia, in fact)...you know how many articles were written in Russia in the 90s that the whole October revolution was the fault of the Jews, because Lenin and his "crew" were Jewish...LOL...these people simply don't have any common sense... he dislikes the US and he is here just because he doesn't want to be hungry in his Russia...it just amazes me how Russian people can detest the whole world and blame everything on other nations, but still try to escape from Russia...



Posted by: inlove

Quote:
Originally posted by AkMike
I'm courious why he dislikes the United States? Because of the prosperity we have vs. the problems back in Russia? If he dislikes the US so much why is he here? How many Blacks, Mexicans and such has he ever met on a 1 on 1 situation? Should we still harbor bad feelings towards Russians based on the cold war era?
And the 20 million Russians he said died during WW2... Seems very high to me. But I think that I've read that number were killed by Stalin ( his own countryman) during his 'purges' before, during and after the war. Has he forgotten the aid that the US gave during the war despite the political differences of our countrys?


20 million soviet people died during WW2, it is a historic fact. Although, obviously, not all of them were ethnic russians.
Stalin killed somewhere around this number of people as well, on top of the ones killed at the war.



Posted by: AkMike

I knew I had read that massive number before. But I didn't kjnow that many died as a result of the war. Terrible



Posted by: Pin Boy

yes, i was quite shocked to read the 20 million WWII deaths a few years back...when i hear of a tragedy in the thousands, i try to imagine a sports stadium full of people perishing, but it 's almost impossible to envision tens of millions of people dying in such a short time span....so. so tragic

pb



Posted by: Khashyar

My understanding is that virtually every Russian family was touched by the Second World War and Stalin.

Lena's grandmother and her family had a difficult time, and at times had nothing decent to eat.

Khashyar



Posted by: Jill

Quote:
yes, i was quite shocked to read the 20 million WWII deaths a few years back


It seems to be a Russian war strategy--just overwhelm the enemy with numbers. Send in a bunch of troops, let them get killed, and send in a bunch more--after all, the villages were filled with expendable young men. Many were sent to almost suicidal deaths and never even stood a chance. If you believe some history books, many were even sent into battle without weapons and told they should just take a gun from someone who has already been killed. In addition, many of the experienced generals and other high ranking officers were killed during the purges prior to the war, so you had 20 year olds leading troops into battle. It was just insane. And so tragic.

Quote:
Lena's grandmother and her family had a difficult time, and at times had nothing decent to eat.


As I think I've mentioned before, my husband's grandparents lived in occupied territory and, for a time, a Nazi general was living in their house. They really liked the German occupation! The Germans were always kind and polite to the people in the village. The Russians were the ones who were stealing from people and beating them. They were quite disappointed when the Germans lost the war.

But, of course, for them it was really just going from one ocupation to another and, as they were just coming off the Famine of '32-'33 (during which some 7 to 10 million Ukrainians died), I suppose it's a question of the lesser of two evils.



Posted by: Jill

Oh, by the way: this May 9th is the 60th anniversary of the end of WWII. So this is a timely discussion.



Posted by: AkMike

Just out of couriousity I did a quick search on Nevsky"our" russian wanna be skinhead and found This

I wonder if he thinks he's a russsian hero on par of his 'namesake'???



Posted by: searcher

The correct link is here: http://sangha.net/messengers/nevsky.htm



Posted by: AkMike

Thanks for getting it fixed Searcher!



Posted by: inlove

I doubt our little nazi here is a hero.

Quote:
It seems to be a Russian war strategy--just overwhelm the enemy with numbers. Send in a bunch of troops, let them get killed, and send in a bunch more--after all, the villages were filled with expendable young men. Many were sent to almost suicidal deaths and never even stood a chance. If you believe some history books, many were even sent into battle without weapons and told they should just take a gun from someone who has already been killed. In addition, many of the experienced generals and other high ranking officers were killed during the purges prior to the war, so you had 20 year olds leading troops into battle. It was just insane. And so tragic.


It is true. Stalin got rid of army generals in 1930s because he was paranoid about somebody orchestrating a plot agains him. He also signed a peace pact with Germans, and the country was completely unprepared for war. People were dying in huge numbers the first two years, while Stalin and Co. were frantically assembling some kind of war economy.. The fact the we won this war still amazes me. Something to tell about the Russian character.

The number 20 million includes everybody who died on the field of battle, were taken to concentration camps, killed during occupation, etc.. I don't think it is completely accurate, but probably ballparked in the right neiborhood.



Posted by: tanya3475

I read that there were special "back up" units during WWII in Russia that always positioned themselves way at the back of the troops during a battle in case someone wanted to run...they shot them so, of course people chose death as heroes instead of death from the hands of their own countrymen...that's how the war was won...they also gave soldiers lots of vodka to give them courage...these are historic facts



Posted by: sidney

Quote:
I read that there were special "back up" units during WWII in Russia that always positioned themselves way at the back of the troops during a battle in case someone wanted to run...they shot them

This was also shown in the film "Enemy at the gate"
Sid



Posted by: AkMike

I find it interesting that our fledgling skinhead/klansman has dropped out after being brought out into the spotlight of the public eye. Kind of like a bug scurrying back under a rock.



Posted by: AkMike

I noticed that he was logged in about 9pm tonight EST. But no comments, Appearantly he doesn't like being 'called on the carpet' in front of everyone..
Gee, What's up with that????



Posted by: Pawel_PL.USA

Yes, of course, he probably means the Aleksander Nevski that defeated the Germanic Teutonic Knights attempting to conquer the Novgorod Principality in 1241. Nothing wrong with that - the Teutonic Knights were Catholic in name only anyhow - even the Popes turned against these Germanic bandits after they realized that they were using Catholicism as a means to conquer for Germans.

ANd by the way, the guy on my avatar is the Polish King Jan III Sobieski, who reigned 1674 - 1696 and was famous for saving Europe and Western-Latin Civilization fromt the Turks and Tatars. The Muslim Turkish vezirs and Tatar khans were at the time intending to conquer Europe, but Sobieski foiled their plans by defeating huge invading Turkish armies at Chocim (1673) and at Vienna (1683).



Posted by: Pawel_PL.USA

Oh, and by the way, I actually think Kashyar looks more like a guy from the Balkans - maybe Yugoslavian, Bulgarian or Greek.



Posted by: Pin Boy

pawel,

You mean that's not your REAL picture??? I always figured you were some kind of royalty but I never thought you'd "lift" a picture of some other nobleman.



pin boy



Posted by: Pawel_PL.USA

http://www.sobieski.lublin.pl/?id=32



Posted by: Barney_Roubles

Apparently there is quite a bit of racism going on in Russia. I recently read an article on how skin head beat a couple of students but I cannot find it any where. I did find this one though..

http://www.axisglobe.com/article.asp?article=331



Posted by: Novosibirsk1

It's interesting. I was in a small market in Siberia and overheard the older ladies in line complaining about the Sarahs ahead of them. As my oldest is named Sarah, my ears perked up. I later asked a Russian friend about this. She laughed and said "oh the old ladies are just complaining about the jewish girls in line". It was a bit eye opening. PS - I also find it a bit odd about why this person cares about your nationality. As we say here "folks is folks".



Posted by: neil277

Hello.

This is a good subject, i have been told by Nataly's cousin i am a racist because i did not like her boyfriend.

As soon as we met them in Germany i felt ok but Nataly felt something was wrong, as we met them for the second day without me knowing what Nataly was thinking i felt the same and told Nataly please tell your cousin we are moving to different part of Germany so we don't have to see them again.

This Billy was meant to be a Doctor but had know equipment to show he was a doctor and when i questioned him he changed subject, then he was meant to be a profession footballer but had know photos in his home.

I knew after the second day they were full of lies and felt they were into something which i would not have liked.

As we were eating i had to keep my head down i could not look at him or her i felt embarassed as we moved onto a bar it became worse and then fire became inside and then i was ready to knock him out but Nataly to me to hold fire.

I hated there stupid kisses and the way they run down Germany after there free education off the state.

I feel he was taking drugs in the toilet and all there stories were lies, Nataly even said she does not know her cousin anymore.

Its quiet funny Natalys cousin telephones Natalys sister to say we left them and Neil is a racist, Natalys sister has had enough of this silly little girl and is ready to tell her what she thinks.

This Billy is a bad seed and slept with her best friend and all his friends are blue boys and lesbians and her friend is a Russian prostitute, i feel normal people would not surround themselves with people like this, i feel Billy sleeps with men and women and something not quiet right with Natalts cousin.

I have told Nataly we will never meet them again and i felt they were looking for us to pay for everything, trips for New Year to Paris they did not even care Nataly had no Visa for Paris, i told them NO, NO, NO we will not be going now stop this stupid subject Now.

I now wish i would have hit him he came so close to be put in hospital if Nataly had not been there he would havebeen hurt.

Nataly told her mum and she said thats my boy, i have friends that have diffent colour skin but this man from Lebannon was something else i felt someting evil from his soul and Natalys cousin soul.

We spoke to a man in Russian pub and he said i am Russian Jew but the Arabs in Germany cause lots of crime, into drugs, and prostitution, i saw lots of begging and women in the age 0f 65+ i feel Germany must rise to stem the flow of imigrants, the true German are very friendly and will help you in a crises, but for us Germany was very expensive and when we go away this year only hot country like spain.

Are people racist i would say yes and no, i see with my own eyes imigrants being abused being paid as little as £30 per day to wire flats, houses how long will it be before an English man or women cant get a job because an imigrant can do it cheaper, i was talking to a Maltees man and he said when he came to England he worked for normal money and not on a low wage like the people of to day.

England must stem the flow of imigration but i feel the Goverment must produce an undercard of people to keep the working class down.

Are Goverments Racist yes, Labour i feel are much worse than any party why not promote David Lammy to become the next Labour leader?

The B.N.P we know they are Racist but it made me laugh they showed a photo of Nick Griffin and his right hand man, his right hand man was a Jew, the nose gave it away and his features.

I feel common sense should be taken by all Goverments and i feel this Goverment should take note from its people and stop talking about other countrie's and look after number one England.

Regards.

Neil



Posted by: B82

I don't want to offend you.
I don't agree with what you said about people from different races, but I understand (somewhat) your response.

You feel threatened because if you felt confident in yourself, you wouldn't be worried about people from other nationalities "taking your women" or "your" jobs. And by the way, the women, if they choose to date someone of a different ethnicity, it is a CHOICE! No one held a gun to their heads and kidnapped them in order to be with them. Love is a choice. As far a jobs, what are "your" jobs? The US is a FREE country where residents and citizens have freedom of choice and speech. Also, the "N" word means ignorant, not black. So therefore since you appear to be ignorant, you would be a "N"-r. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but that doesn't mean that they are always right. No matter what you say, people of different ethnicities will continue to mix with each other until the end of time. It's been happening since the beginning and it is NEVER going to end. By the way, did you know that the first people came from Africa? Think abour your ethnicity. I'm sure that you are not pure. NOBODY is pure ANYTHING!

Best regards.



Posted by: Hostile_hostage

It's strange but i think a feeling of 'dislike' remains in the U.K towards the French and the Germans. This feeling carries over from the past 'World Wars'.
It's not that our parents or teachers openly instuct that we must dislike people from these countries. I think it's more to do with the past and what we have learnt about what happened during the conflicts between Great Britain, France and Germany.
I think the Spanish would be included but the conflict betwween out two countries is a little too distant as are the battles between Britain and America before we became allies.
Personally I believe that people in France and Germany are no different from people in my own country.



Posted by: inlove

Quote:
Originally Posted by neil277
Hello.

This is a good subject, i have been told by Nataly's cousin i am a racist because i did not like her boyfriend.


Are you a racist? Yes, it seems like you are, since, apparently, only a number of BLACK immigrants concerns you, not the fact that your wife is an immigrant herself. You also have a very low tolerance for other people's choices and lifestyles, seems like. Your wife also share your beliefs, so you two fit each other to a tee.



Posted by: Keith In Kodiak

Inlove, you're always so quick to label others. I'm a wifebeater - remember? What was that based on?
And now this guy above is a racist.

There is nothing racist about wanting to stem immigration. All countries have their own cultures and social histories. And it's not racist to want to keep those institutions intact.
A recent poll in Britain reveals that a large majority of Muslims favor Sharia law in the UK - and this poll was not limited to recent immigrants but to all Muslims, some of which had been there for generations.

This sort of belief is not compatible with Western culture. Sharia law says a non-Muslim can not testify against a Muslim. It puts severe restrictions on the behavior of women.

An open door immigration policy would likely see these laws voted into place in a generation or so when Muslims become the majority.

That's not an expression of hatred against Muslims. It's simple recognition of cultural differences. I would not wish to live under Muslim law. That does not make me a racist!
This man above lives in a Europe which is being flooded with uncontrolled immigration from Islamic countries. He is correct (in my opinion) to express concern. Many of those people are African and therefore black, others are from the Middle East - some are from the Balkans and are as fair complected as you. It's hardly racism.

I'm quite sure (and perhaps he'll correct me if I'm wrong) that he has no issue at all with his friends and neighbors from dominion countries like Jamaica or Belize.



Posted by: inlove

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith In Kodiak
Inlove, you're always so quick to label others. I'm a wifebeater - remember? What was that based on?
And now this guy above is a racist.


Keith, I never said you were a wifebeater, so please don't put somebody else's words in my mough. Neil has asked "Am I a racist", and I answered his question, based on the impression his post and his previous posts about this issue left on me.

Quote:
There is nothing racist about wanting to stem immigration. All countries have their own cultures and social histories. And it's not racist to want to keep those institutions intact.
A recent poll in Britain reveals that a large majority of Muslims favor Sharia law in the UK - and this poll was not limited to recent immigrants but to all Muslims, some of which had been there for generations.

This sort of belief is not compatible with Western culture. Sharia law says a non-Muslim can not testify against a Muslim. It puts severe restrictions on the behavior of women.

An open door immigration policy would likely see these laws voted into place in a generation or so when Muslims become the majority.

That's not an expression of hatred against Muslims. It's simple recognition of cultural differences. I would not wish to live under Muslim law. That does not make me a racist!
This man above lives in a Europe which is being flooded with uncontrolled immigration from Islamic countries. He is correct (in my opinion) to express concern. Many of those people are African and therefore black, others are from the Middle East - some are from the Balkans and are as fair complected as you. It's hardly racism.

I'm quite sure (and perhaps he'll correct me if I'm wrong) that he has no issue at all with his friends and neighbors from dominion countries like Jamaica or Belize.


As long as they don't stem immigration based on the color of skin and/or religious beliefs, it's fine with me.



Posted by: Ade

Hi Keith, Inlove,

Both of you make some good points, but from reading other posts by Neil I'd say he's racist, homophobic and a whole lot of other thigs; I could be wrong, I admit, but that's the impression he gives out.

You may have noticed that for no discernible reason (and I mean reason, not just his vague impressions) he has told us how he wanted to beat someone up for - looking again at what he has written - no other reason than being Lebanese.

Yes, the UK does need to look at practical immigration, and the Govt needs to address the problem in reality rather than with stated desires. And it does need to address cultural issues as well, raised by immigration.

But Neil has also explicitly said in previous posts that Western style freedoms are bad, and that we'd be better of under a Belarus-style dictatorship, and that his wife was to explain just exactly why (but never did) - so we don't want people here taking our English jobs, but we also don't want our English Government.........

At times, I'm quite lost with what exactly he does mean

Ade



Posted by: Keith In Kodiak

OK, you didn't say I was a wife beater, you only insinuated this.

And of course immigration quotas are based on things like religion, ethnicity and national origin. Frankly I think it's insane to not take religion, if nothing else, into account in these things.
I want as few people as possible coming into my country that think women are chattel and that non-Muslims are not entitled to any rights.
We can extend our beliefs to them, but the religion itself is one that is incompatible with life in the West. It is incompatable with civil liberties since it puts women and non-muslims into the same category as animals.

The situation in Europe is much more grave than here. They are being overwhelmed with illegal immigration from Muslim countries and there seems to be no political will to take action about this. Look at this situation in France a few weeks ago - thousands of Muslims burning tens of thousands of cars, destroying property, gang raping women... And many of these people are illegal aliens!
And what do they want? They demand the government give them more money and services. It's insane that a legal immigrant can arrive in a country and get any services or money without having paid into the system, but it's doubly insane that illegal immigrants can demand this and then hold a nation hostage with violence to get it.

No, it's not racism to recognize the simple truth.



Posted by: Keith In Kodiak

Ade,

You could be correct, but I could get so tired of inloves constant digs at everyone that it's difficult not to respond.

It's not racism to recognize that certain religions and philosophies are incompatable with western culture. What is the difference between some Islamic sects and Nazism? They both demand the extermination of Jews. They both demand the overthrow of democratic governments. They both advocate violence to achieve these means. They both advocate the replacement of the rule of law with the rule of political or religious zealots.

We wouldn't argue about decreasing the number of NAZI's immigrating to a country. We wouldn't argue about expelling illegal immigrant NAZI's. But when we talk about Islam it's suddenly taboo.

And I know there are many moderate Muslims who do not advocate Sharia law or violence! However, the MAJORITY do advocate these things. As individuals you have to take them as you find them - good, bad or indifferent. But as a group, knowing that the majority feel the way they do it makes no sense to encouarge this religion spreading into the west.



Posted by: inlove

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith In Kodiak
OK, you didn't say I was a wife beater, you only insinuated this.


i did not insuniate it either.

Quote:
And of course immigration quotas are based on things like religion, ethnicity and national origin. Frankly I think it's insane to not take religion, if nothing else, into account in these things.
I want as few people as possible coming into my country that think women are chattel and that non-Muslims are not entitled to any rights.
We can extend our beliefs to them, but the religion itself is one that is incompatible with life in the West. It is incompatable with civil liberties since it puts women and non-muslims into the same category as animals.

The situation in Europe is much more grave than here. They are being overwhelmed with illegal immigration from Muslim countries and there seems to be no political will to take action about this. Look at this situation in France a few weeks ago - thousands of Muslims burning tens of thousands of cars, destroying property, gang raping women... And many of these people are illegal aliens!
And what do they want? They demand the government give them more money and services. It's insane that a legal immigrant can arrive in a country and get any services or money without having paid into the system, but it's doubly insane that illegal immigrants can demand this and then hold a nation hostage with violence to get it.

No, it's not racism to recognize the simple truth.


You can believe into whatever you want, Keith, but it does not mean that others have to share your beliefs, does it? When I see a racist, I call him a racist, sorry if it bothers you.



Posted by: bingism

Definition of a racist:

"A person who believes that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others"

I'm not sure anyone, other than the person who started this thread way back when, has actually expressed a racist view. In particular Neil, whilst clearly pretty passionate about this subject, has not said "this person is a leech because he/she is black, white, pink, blue, or otherwise". It's interesting that whenever this subject is raised, the racism card comes out. It's perfectly possible to hold strong views and, in this case, this is "resentment" not "racism". Everyone is entitled to their views and should not have to fear being labelled as something abhorrent.

To give you an example of understandable resentment:
My grandfather has lived in his house for 50-years. There are some 300 houses in this one street and when he moved there it was like any other London area - 300 families, 95% white english speakers and 5%'ish everybody else. 50-years later, it's only 5% whilte english speaking. My grandfather can't read the signs in nearly all the shops because they are in Urdu, Hinid or Punjabi.... Is he supposed to say "that's great, I love living in multi-cultural England"? He's not racist, but by jove is he p**sed off.

In fact, immigration IS a problem in the UK and not one associated with race or the greater influence of different cultures on UK society. It is purely a matter of economics! Finite resources, finite jobs, finite houses yet a seemingly infinite amount of people... Nearly all UK governments have acknowledged that this can be a problem. Unfortunately we are a nation built on certain founding principles and one of these is to offer safe haven to any person who's civil liberties are under threat - hence our apparent asylum issues.

Now, economic immigrancy is something different and everyone accepts that this needs to be more tightly controlled. The difficulty is that it is impossible to control immigrancy without mentioning and in some form discriminating on the basis of race. In the Commonwealth and EU we have reciprocal agreements that all citizens are entitled to take work (with a few exceptions in trade unionist areas such as France) in any country and that free passage shall be unhindered. This is designed to keep a fair balance of the work-force across the EU / Commonwealth territory. Therefore a non-EU / Commonwealth citizen will have a far harder time getting a work visa and residency. This is racist under these vague modern definitions of the word.

People need to understand each other's perspectives a little more, especially before assigning people to certain groups and giving them a name. It's also important to remember that even the racist is entitled to his opinion - it's called freedom!

Bing



Posted by: CheyennePress

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith In Kodiak
It's not racism to recognize that certain religions and philosophies are incompatable with western culture. What is the difference between some Islamic sects and Nazism? They both demand the extermination of Jews. They both demand the overthrow of democratic governments. They both advocate violence to achieve these means. They both advocate the replacement of the rule of law with the rule of political or religious zealots.

We wouldn't argue about decreasing the number of NAZI's immigrating to a country. We wouldn't argue about expelling illegal immigrant NAZI's. But when we talk about Islam it's suddenly taboo.


You do raise some good points. When you look at the world's major conflicts and ethnic skirmishes... in Indonesia, in Palestine, in Thailand, Spain, England, in Australia (with the recent riots stemming from rape), in France, 9/11 in the US, Pakistan-India, Bangledesh, in Russia, the Netherlands, Lebanon and the demolition of what was once a thriving country, in Nigeria, in the Sudan... they all involve Islamofascists. People who cannot accept life anyway but their own. Just as a for instance, if you preach Christianity in Saudi Arabia, you can be beaten, jailed, or put to death.

There are moderate voices in Islam, but they are far too few and they know they'll be executed if they speak out, so they are all too often meaningless. It will be interesting to see if Iraq can turn into another Turkey--a nation, albeit far from free from Islamist influence, that at least enjoys some freedoms.

I think it is wise to limit immigration and very strongly scrutinize immigrants who may have been involved in more radical Islamic elements. A failure to do such has led to all too predictable results in Europe.



Posted by: obx2005

BTW, I'll probably get chopped off at the knees for this but it needs to be said...(Image of me donning my flak vest)
Stemming immigration should be based on the ability of a nation to accept immigrants
and offer them the same oppurtunities that it's current citizens possess...ie; in the
US, the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness...within the constructs of the established
society and government of that nation and not to enable the changing of that construct
through immigrant numbers...

On the subject of race or religion being a factor, on the whole, I agree with the concept
that these should not be factors in making immigration decisions. However I also believe that
these issues should be used to make deeper inquiries into the validity of the applicants'
intent for immigrating...

Food for thought...this has been circulated frequently through email and forums...

http://politicalmachine.com/Forums.asp?MID=3&AID=62030


HISTORY TEST
Please pause a moment, reflect back, and take the following multiple
choice test. The events are actual cuts from past history.

1) 1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by:
a. Superman
b. Jay Lenno
c. Harry Potter
d. Muslim male extremist between the ages of 17 and 40

2) In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by:
a. Olga Corbett
b. Sitting Bull
c. Arnold Schwarzenegger
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

3) In 1979, the US embassy in Iran w! as taken over by:
a. Lost Norwegians
b. Elvis
c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old women
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

4) During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by:
a. John Dillinger
b. The King of Sweden
c. The Boy Scouts
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

5) In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by:
a. A pizza delivery boy
b. Pee Wee Herman
c. Geraldo Rivera
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

6) In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old
American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by:
a. The Smurfs
b. Davy Jones
c. The Little Mermaid
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

7) In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a US Navy diver trying to
rescue passengers was murdered by:
a. Captain Kidd
b. Charles Lindberg
c. Mother Teresa
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

8) In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by:
a. Scooby Doo
b. The Tooth Fairy
c. Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

9) In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by:
a. Richard Simmons
b. Grandma Moses
c. Michael Jordan
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

10) In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by:
a. Mr. Rogers
b. Hillary Clinton, to distract attention from Wild Bill's women problems
c. The World Wrestling Federation
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

11) On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to
take out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon
and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers. Thousands of us people were killed by:
a. Bugs Bunny, Wiley E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd
b. The Supreme Court of Florida
c. Mr. Bean
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

12) In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against:
a. Enron
b. The Lutheran Church
c. The NFL
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

13) In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by:
a. Bonnie and Clyde
b. Captain Kangaroo
c. Billy Graham
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

Nope, ...I really don't see a pattern here to justify profiling, do you?
So, to ensure we Americans never offend anyone, particularly fanatics
intent on killing us, airport security screeners will no longer be allowed to
profile certain people. They must conduct random searches of 80-year-old women,
little kids, airline pilots with proper identification, secret agents who are members
of the President's security detail, 85-year old Congressmen with metal
hips, and Medal of Honor winning and former Governor Joe Foss, but leave Muslim
Males between the ages 17 and 40 alone because of profiling.

Before passing judgement note that in 20 years of US Army service, I have worked with
and for all ethnicities, races, and yes, even religions. In 1997, Bosnia, I was involved in
removal of a 12 year old, Muslim Bosnian from the middle of a minefield where he had just
lost both legs in an explosion. My ex in-laws were from Germany, Ghana, Bosnia, Crotia, and India...

I do not harbor any racism or discrimination...But I can see a pattern that has developed
that I believe should be investigated...

Love and Peace is the concept...Will it ever be?

Jeff



Posted by: Keith In Kodiak

Well stated, Jeff!

As individuals there are many fine Muslims. And it was a good call to point out Turkey which has had many years of democratic/non-Islamic rule.

Muslim immigration really isn't that big an issue in the US (in my opinion) since the numbers are commensurate with other immigration from non-Islamic nations.
It's Europe that is facing a real problem. Projections indicate that if current immigration trends continue many European nations will have Muslim majorities within a relatively short time - within our childrens lives, perhaps. Then what happens? Do we see Sharia law imposed? Do we see women without burkas beaten in the streets?

It's a genuine problem. And the discussion of this shouldn't be beaten down with cries of "racism."



Posted by: neil277

Quote:
Originally Posted by inlove
Are you a racist? Yes, it seems like you are, since, apparently, only a number of BLACK immigrants concerns you, not the fact that your wife is an immigrant herself. You also have a very low tolerance for other people's choices and lifestyles, seems like. Your wife also share your beliefs, so you two fit each other to a tee.


Nataly came to England because we both wanted to be together and Nataly feels the same as me imigration must be slowed down, we have done everything by the book, asylum get everthing for nothing.

One it does not matter what colour they are but when people lie to my face thats it, i will turn my back on them and never talk again.

I am a strong person but if you have people working for £40 per day there is a problem when the normal price for work is £130-£140 per day.

And Americans still fly the flag which states no N****** on my land this would never happen in England.

I'm from South London and within 1 second of meeting someone i can uncover if they are good or bad and Natalys cousins boyfriend was a bad seed and Natalys cousin was just full of lies, even Nataly said Neil i thought i new my Cousin but she was fox for many years.

When i was looking for a wife i would look for white wife but this does not make me a racist.

Germany are in a state and the Arabs are always causing problems which we were told by the local people.

Regards.

Neil



Posted by: bingism

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith In Kodiak
Then what happens? Do we see Sharia law imposed? Do we see women without burkas beaten in the streets?

It's a genuine problem. And the discussion of this shouldn't be beaten down with cries of "racism."


A little on the unrealistic side of probability, but if it happens I guess all we can say is that this is the power of democracy... majority rule! But yes, I agree with your second point.

The bottom line is that this is not a matter of religion. Anyone who has cared to listen to the Muslim majority will realise that the Qu'ran is widely interpretted to teach tolerance. It could easily be argued that the Bible is far less tolerant and far more condemning of those who fail to believe it's content. Terrorism is not waged by religion... these are the acts of violent, twisted individuals who either lack the intelligence to understand different points of view or are hellbent on making trouble for their own rewards. Their are many examples of this and one is the trouble in Northern Ireland. After the ceasefire, did the trouble go away? In part, but many of these so called Soldiers went on to become the self-appointed justice police, dishing out punishments (beatings) to those they thought deserved it (or rather those who stepped on their illegal activities).

The idiots who killed my friend in the July bombings last year, did so for their own gain (notably to get to a place where they would have 107 women, or whatever foolishness they believed). These are the actions of a minority of mentally disturbed individuals and I do not believe that this should be held against the majority, no matter how hard that may be!

I have my own opinions about religion as a whole, but I shall keep these to myself. I will point out that even going back to the Crusades, religious belief has been used as an "excuse" for humans to do what they do best - kill each other!!

Bing



Posted by: obx2005

Quote:
And Americans still fly the flag which states no N****** on my land this would never happen in England.




Neil,

Not sure what flag you are referring to...

Jeff



Posted by: Pin Boy

maybe he's referring to the confederate flag which still incites some controversy???

pin boy

ps great multiple choice post. by the way, if not your original work, what is the source?



Posted by: obx2005

Just, I never saw one that stated what Neil said it does...and I'm from the South...

Jeff

Sorry, I'll be quiet now. Kinda find myself off-topic...



Posted by: obx2005

Quote:
ps great multiple choice post. by the way, if not your original work, what is the source?


Got it email several zillion times but edited post to reflect one link out of a million on Google.

thanks PinBoy

Jeff



Posted by: inlove

Quote:
Originally Posted by neil277
Nataly came to England because we both wanted to be together and Nataly feels the same as me imigration must be slowed down, we have done everything by the book, asylum get everthing for nothing.


What do you mean by 'everything for nothing"? Your wife is an immigrant, just like everybody else, so please don't kid yourself. The fact that she is married to the british guy does not change the fact that she is an immigrant, and thus is increasing UK immigrant population, adding a burden to your social system.

Quote:
One it does not matter what colour they are but when people lie to my face thats it, i will turn my back on them and never talk again.


So then why somebody's personal lies promt your long monologue about black immigration? What does immigration in general has to do with the fact that some lebanese guy is lying to you?

Quote:
I am a strong person but if you have people working for £40 per day there is a problem when the normal price for work is £130-£140 per day.


i'm sure they would be happy to work for 130-140 as well. It's the loopholes in a labor law that allow emloyers to pay only 40, not the immigration itself.

Quote:
And Americans still fly the flag which states no N****** on my land this would never happen in England.


not true. You are lying to us now.

Quote:
I'm from South London and within 1 second of meeting someone i can uncover if they are good or bad and Natalys cousins boyfriend was a bad seed and Natalys cousin was just full of lies, even Nataly said Neil i thought i new my Cousin but she was fox for many years.


How many years? 20-30? Long time to play a fox. More likely, she suddenly became a fox in your wife's eyes once she started dating a "lying" lebanese.



Posted by: inlove

Quote:
Originally Posted by obx2005
Got it email several zillion times but edited post to reflect one link out of a million on Google.

thanks PinBoy

Jeff


Good post , Jeff. Le't not forget that there are plenty of Timothy McVeighs out there as well.



Posted by: obx2005

Hi InLove,

You're right...sometimes hard to imagine anyone, regardless of nationality, race, etc. being capable of these things. I guess that no matter the religion, race, preferences, I'm kinda tired of excuses being made not to examine certain issues more closely because of claims of discrimination, when there is factual evidence that would indicate otherwise...my parents always told me "...why should you mind if you have nothing to hide"...

That was my point...not to vindicate any discrimination whatsoever...BTW McVeigh, Nichols, etc., the jury is still out as to whether they acted alone or with the help of Muslim contact...Propaganda? Don't Know? Maybe the truth will come one day...

Thanks for your reply,

Jeff



Posted by: inlove

Quote:
Originally Posted by obx2005
Hi InLove,

You're right...sometimes hard to imagine anyone, regardless of nationality, race, etc. being capable of these things. I guess that no matter the religion, race, preferences, I'm kinda tired of excuses being made not to examine certain issues more closely because of claims of discrimination, when there is factual evidence that would indicate otherwise...my parents always told me "...why should you mind if you have nothing to hide"...

That was my point...not to vindicate any discrimination whatsoever...BTW McVeigh, Nichols, etc., the jury is still out as to whether they acted alone or with the help of Muslim contact...Propaganda? Don't Know? Maybe the truth will come one day...

Thanks for your reply,

Jeff


Yeah, maybe some day we will know truth about JFK's murder. There is another side that people in the US don't like to talk about. It is the fact that the US has supported Taliban and Osama for many years, before they turned around and bit their sponsors in the a**.



Posted by: obx2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by inlove
Yeah, maybe some day we will know truth about JFK's murder. There is another side that people in the US don't like to talk about. It is the fact that the US has supported Taliban and Osama for many years, before they turned around and bit their sponsors in the a**.

I don't see why this would not be discussed. It is a matter of truth. Throughout history this has happened many times to all nations in some form or another...

Russia had a pact with Nazi Germany prior to Operation Barbarosa. I think political decisions, whether good or bad, are made based on their current environment. I really can't see any implications to the pact Russia made with Germany or the support America gave to the Taliban that would have precluded the inevitable conflicts that occurred in these instances.

This topic should not be taboo under any circumstances and as strange as it may sound, should not influence later decisions that must be made on future circumstances. If we were able to tell the future, we would still not be able to avoid the world's conflicts...Do I make any sense?

Jeff



Posted by: CheyennePress

Quote:
Originally Posted by bingism
A little on the unrealistic side of probability, but if it happens I guess all we can say is that this is the power of democracy... majority rule! But yes, I agree with your second point.


Not that Nigeria was ever paradise, but that's what they thought, as well, before they were invaded with waves of immigrants and their population became majority Muslim. Now they have Shar'ia. It really depends on how hardline the Muslims are that are immigrating, doesn't it? How well they blend into the local populace and its code of ethics. How large of a majority they become. Turks, for instance, are less likely to be exteremists, and Turkey, albeit far from as tolerant as a Western society, is not going to publically execute those who hold different beliefs. You probably won't ever see Sharia from Turk immigrants.

Quote:
The bottom line is that this is not a matter of religion. Anyone who has cared to listen to the Muslim majority will realise that the Qu'ran is widely interpretted to teach tolerance.


I simply ask the question of why Muslim populations can't seem to get along with anyone, anywhere in the modern world once a sizeable population is reached. There is the inherent susceptibility to extremist elements in Islam (e.g. there is no hierarchy like what you see in the Christian faith whereby authority may quash extremists; that there are no real specific qualifications for being an imam), but there isn't, for instance, that kind of authority in Judaism or Buddhism, either.

Quote:
It could easily be argued that the Bible is far less tolerant and far more condemning of those who fail to believe it's content.


Do you honestly believe this? I doubt it. Islam teaches that the entire Qur'an is equal, that each verse is to be taken as equal. Jesus specifically spoke out against strict legalism and even was considered by many to break the law himself. The New Testament is a complete reworking of the Old. The whole matter of He who has not sinned... Do unto others... Go and sin no more. That judgement is God's. Unless you want to have a quibble with God, which is beyond either you or I if He is a given, then you really can't make the claim that Christianity is less tolerant. Tolerance, as it is so relevant, is a human virtue for life here on earth. No sense muddying the waters with nonproductive theological ramblings.

Quote:
Terrorism is not waged by religion... these are the acts of violent, twisted individuals who either lack the intelligence to understand different points of view or are hellbent on making trouble for their own rewards.


I would argue that terrorism is the work of those who make no room for the views of others in their worldview and that it can be the work of religious elements, particularly when it is ascribed by religious leaders (though again there is the argument of greed for power and a deleusion of perfection, which I see as stronger). But really, I don't see lack of intelligence or being self-serving being a comprehensive description, at all. I can, for instance, understand another viewpoint, but consider it abhorrent and condemn it forthright. Pedophilia, for instance. I'll not tolerate it. If that makes me less intelligent, so be it. Same thing goes with child sacrifice or (more relevantly) shame killing (of which you've seen several in Britain, if I'm not mistaken). It's barbaric and I'll flat out say inferior to my belief system. Of course, the same thing can be said of say, women walking around in public in bikinis. Nothing necessarily self-serving about that. Nothing unintelligent about it. It may just be a hardline belief, set forth by the idea that it causes impure thoughts (and you and I both know that can be true...



Posted by: bingism

Quote:
Originally Posted by inlove
What do you mean by 'everything for nothing"? Your wife is an immigrant, just like everybody else, so please don't kid yourself. The fact that she is married to the british guy does not change the fact that she is an immigrant, and thus is increasing UK immigrant population, adding a burden to your social system.



So then why somebody's personal lies promt your long monologue about black immigration? What does immigration in general has to do with the fact that some lebanese guy is lying to you?



i'm sure they would be happy to work for 130-140 as well. It's the loopholes in a labor law that allow emloyers to pay only 40, not the immigration itself.



not true. You are lying to us now.



How many years? 20-30? Long time to play a fox. More likely, she suddenly became a fox in your wife's eyes once she started dating a "lying" lebanese.


Inlove, for an RMP Moderator you really do push the boat a little too far sometimes.

1. As I'm sure you are aware, in order to get the fiancee / spouse visa you need to prove that you "won't" be a burden on the social system! There is also a big difference between social migrancy and economic migrancy and since you are such an expert, I'm sure I need not explain such things to you.

2. If you understood the asylum process in the UK, you would understand the perception of "everything for nothing"

3. I think you'll find Neil has not once mentioned "black" immigration.

4. It is not a loophole in the employment laws that allows the disparity between normal wages and "other" wages. It's simply a supply and demand issue. When someone from a different economic background sees £40 a day, it seems like a comparitive fortune. After a few months, they realise that this is not the case and move on to higher paid work, to be replaced by another who is similarly blinded by the perceived value of sterling.

5. I'm not sure I understand the whole flag thing

6. From the story told, it would seem that Neil and his wife took offence to a lying man who happened to be Lebanese and not the other way round.

Off-topic:
Inlove, I've been around this site for a good few months now and you seem to revel in attacking people rather than discussing things. I for one would love to see Kashyar remove your Moderator status, since your bigotted and outrageous misinterpretations are adding a very sour taste to this site! You seem to have a significant amount of venom that you wish to inflict on us and quite often your comments spoil otherwise interesting discussions. It must be a very embittered life that you are leading, especially since you seem to have an endless amount of time to add your vitriolic comments to RMP.

Bing (I've just lost my rag....)



Posted by: Keith In Kodiak

Quote:
Originally Posted by inlove
Good post , Jeff. Le't not forget that there are plenty of Timothy McVeighs out there as well.


Maybe you fail to understand that it's the same thing! McVeigh is (was) a fascist. Islamic extremists are fascists. Even most Islamic "moderates" are fascist since they favor imposing Sharia law.

It isn't racism to recognize these things.



Posted by: Keith In Kodiak

Quote:
Originally Posted by bingism
A little on the unrealistic side of probability, but if it happens I guess all we can say is that this is the power of democracy... majority rule! But yes, I agree with your second point.



It's not unrealistic at all. The current immigration trends, coupled with the much higher birthrate of Muslims will see Europe a Muslim continent within a relatively short time.
And there was a poll not long ago among UK Muslims that showed the large majority of them wish for Sharia law in the UK.
Look at what is happening in France right now and you see what is awaiting Britain in just a few years. And those numbers will continue to tilt towards the Muslim community as time goes on.

Look at these kids who bombed London recently. They've lived in the UK all of their lives. They lived on the dole rather than work. Yet, they hate you and everything about your country. You want more of these people?



Posted by: inlove

Quote:
Originally Posted by obx2005
I don't see why this would not be discussed. It is a matter of truth. Throughout history this has happened many times to all nations in some form or another...


I don't know why, but somehow it often turns out this way. Or they get really angry..

Quote:
Russia had a pact with Nazi Germany prior to Operation Barbarosa. I think political decisions, whether good or bad, are made based on their current environment. I really can't see any implications to the pact Russia made with Germany or the support America gave to the Taliban that would have precluded the inevitable conflicts that occurred in these instances.

This topic should not be taboo under any circumstances and as strange as it may sound, should not influence later decisions that must be made on future circumstances. If we were able to tell the future, we would still not be able to avoid the world's conflicts...Do I make any sense?

Jeff


You do.



Posted by: Ade

Hi,

Adding to the 'everything for nothing' in the UK; yes, asylum seekers do seem to get that - but there have also been many documented cases of asylum seekers who were willing and able to work (e.g. doctors) but were not able to because they were in the asylum 'process'.

There are also plenty of white British who want everything for nothing.....as anyone of you who live in a town or city in the UK know, we've plenty of homegrown freeloading good-for-nothings who are a drain on society, with an unwillingness to work and an attitude that the state should provide for them.

But when a member here criticizes immigrants they should maybe first consider the position of their immigrant wife/girlfriend. Because, like it or not, they are getting 'everything for nothing', or at least some substantial things, such as free NHS treatment - and they aren't contributing in the initial period, and maybe never if their partners earn a lot and want a stay-at-home wife.

Bing, Neil took offence at a man he 'felt' was lying, who he 'felt' sleeps with men and women' and who he 'felt' was taking drugs in the toilet; only on feelings, not fact - and there doesn't seem to be any reason he felt like beating him up apart from the fact he was Lebanese; if race/nationality wasn't an issue, why mention it?

On other issues, yes, immigration is an issue our Government are unwilling to seriously address, because they are unwilling to upset anybody; and that's a non-sensical situation. And as Jeff points out, lots of very serious incidents against the West have been perpetrated by Islamic fanatics.

Regards,

Ade



Posted by: Tatsy

Only my standpoint:
Any war has true underlying reason and false justification. The true underlying reason is always capture of new material assets. The false justification can be any other one, but always it is the theory, that should attract and fascinate minds of many people and create controlled crowd. It can be the theory of nazism, communism, struggle for democracy and so on... Currently the basic threat is Islam. Do you know how Arabian children are brought up? When the men perish participating in any terrorist act, their mothers and wives are glad and are happy. They say to their children that their fathers have got in paradise, and there is not more happiness, than to serve to Allah. I saw two small cute Arabian girls of ten years' age (in the fragment from the Arabian TV). They spoke that they want to become Shahids (terrorists) to get in paradise. They laughed and said very nicely that they dream of it, as in it is true sense of life. In the Arabian Emirates the special service is watching that all people would pray not less than five times per day and is punishing the infringers. The images and pictures of the people and animals are forbidden. These people are illiterate, and children are studying basically only Koran. I do not speak about their leaders that are well educated. These leaders damn Christian culture, but they rather willingly use all its achievement and boons. The Christian culture has given to the World the huge amount of scientists, artists, poets, actors and so on... What has Islam given to the World? Islam can give nothing, as the religion forbids doing it.
Islam is the most regressive, conservative and aggressive religion from all present religions currently. And at present, Islam really threatens the Christian (western) culture, like what the illiterate hungry barbarians threatened the educated full lazy Rome.

Ok, begin to throw tomatoes in me...



Posted by: bobjf

tats i for 1 will not throw tomatoes at you simply because you are right
i am not racist in anyway but i am disturbed by the way muslims move into a country for a better life ( 1 they could never acheive in there own country)& then try to shanghi that country,s way of life.
so saying that it isn,t all muslims just those who as tats says want a free ride & mostly from 1 country.
we are starting to have this problem in australia & only from 1 culture,never hear a peep out of other muslims.
they just get on with enjoying a new home that has given them hope,mostly hardworking nice people who don,t make waves.
remember all the do gooders in eyes of allah there is only 1 religen islam ,the rest of us are infidels.



Posted by: Novosibirsk1

To the original person who started this thread: You are a facist of the worst type. Most despicable indeed. A poor little man who blames others for his problems. Don't like the USA? I LOVE AMERICA! -get the hell out.



Posted by: annagybe

Did anyone see European Journal this weekend? (English language news produced by Deutsche Welle for PBS)
They had a story about skinheads in Russia, specifically St. Petersburg. SP had 20 racist killings last year. They documented a case of a murded African student. The only hopeful part of the story is that there seems to be a nascent human rights group forming.
As far as contributions of the Islamic world, I beg to differ with Tats. If it wasn't for the Islamic Empire that existed during the European Dark Ages, we wouldn't have any of the Greek and Roman literature, writings, philosophy that is the backbone of Western Civilization. We also wouldn't have the concept of zero without the Islamic Empire. Can you imagine doing even simple mathematics with Roman numerals? Many biological, medical, astromonical ideas were maintained, expanded upon, and newly discovered in the Middle East while Europe was struggling prior to the Renaissance. E.g., Al-Razi.
I don't like painting people with broad strokes. I've met good Muslims, just as I've met bad Christians, and indifferent agnostics, and everyone in between. Absolutism is not a way of life.

-anna-

(Edited to include a name I'd forgotten. Gotta love Wikipedia.)



Posted by: Tatsy

Anna, unfortunately, I could not find in the Internet the information on the time of occurrence of Islam (it seems, 4-th century of our era). As far as I know, Islam is the youngest religion. It is younger than Christianity. Many biological, medical, astronomical ideas had arisen long before occurrence of Islam. And especially, if to say about Greek and Roman literature, writings, philosophy. There was no Islam at that time.
But I agree with you. Probably, during the European Dark Ages, Christianity with its terrible Inquisition was more regressive, and Islam was more progressive.
But I want to explain I said about the PRESENT TIME. And I specially have emphasized it: "Islam is the most conservative religion CURRENTLY."



Posted by: bobjf

inlove a question.
a couple of weeks ago a simular thing happened in australia as in france.
forget about media hype, what realy happened was simmering resentment of what so called men of middle eastern extraction had been doing for years ie: attending the beach & other venues & creating problems, abuseing girls (including my russian step daughter & her tongan girlfriend) for wearing bikini,s & dressing like whores, even had some of these mongrels try to order several of us from ocean pool so there women could use it exclusivly. well excuse me this is a free country & public places are just that. no 1 has the right to abuse & bar others. see the point. just the surface of what these types want,no xmas carols or decorations,different laws & rules for them because of there beleifs. our laws are for all.
it isn,t anywhere near all the muslims, a lot of them are nice people
now the poin t is media & gov blew up at aussies for fighting back after all there in action,they were quick to lable australians as raceist & make arrests but very slow to do anything against the long term perpatraters & are getting heaps from an embarrassed media.
police commander who was sacked because he dared to air the truth has been reinstated & gov is backpeddling like crazy but the damage is done.
so just who is the raceist here us for being stupid enough allowing these radicals to stay here or them for coming to a once very peacefull happy go lucky country & trying to impose there way of life on there benifactors.
should you try the same sought of tactics in there country just how long do you think you would stay alive.
just why should we allow these people to destroy our lucky country
mate if that makes me a raceist then your a sandwhich short of a picnic



Posted by: mistermopar


Very well put bobjf.
I am not a raceist,but I will agree with you about other nationalities coming to our country,or your country and expecting the laws and peoples beleifs to change for them.


Randy



Posted by: bingism

Quote:
Originally Posted by mistermopar

Very well put bobjf.
I am not a raceist,but I will agree with you about other nationalities coming to our country,or your country and expecting the laws and peoples beleifs to change for them.

This is a problem not only with Muslims (not that you said it was Randy)... Everyone is aware of the "English Expats" who've taken over parts of Spain! It will always be a problem when expats congregate together and fail to do what they set out to do - i.e. move to another country. I can't understand why anyone would, for example, move to Spain and create a little-England!!! It's a mystery to me...
Bing



Posted by: clever1

Here's just a little point, out of all the immigrants that move anywhere in the world, I have only ever heard of the muslims forming their own Parliament, ie the Muslim Council of Great Britain, as far as I'm concerned they are traitors, and belong in the Tower, its things like this that alienate them from indigenous people, and proves they don't want to integrate into any society that already exists. As for the belief that the only religion is Islam, doesn't that make Muslims Racist ?

Just my thoughts on the matter.

John



Posted by: Keith In Kodiak

Quote:
Originally Posted by inlove
Yeah, maybe some day we will know truth about JFK's murder.


Yes, and then there's the Elvis-Bigfoot conspiracy... Keep your tinfoil hat on!

Quote:
Originally Posted by inlove
There is another side that people in the US don't like to talk about. It is the fact that the US has supported Taliban and Osama for many years, before they turned around and bit their sponsors in the a**.


That was a pretty good call actually. The Taliban killed far fewer people in their time in Afghanistan than the Soviets did.



Posted by: Ade

Hi John,

The Muslim Council of Great Britain is certainly not a Parliament and has no statutory powers in the UK - so while it may be unwelcome it isn't anything for most people to worry about.

Keith, you can't judge how good a 'call' something is on the number of people killed as a result.....looking back at a history book will show that the Brits killed far fewer Native Americans than the US Govt ever did.....and I'm sure most (or all?!?) the Americans here wouldn't say that the War of Independence was wrong? - it was, of course.....if you hadn't gone all petty over the price of tea and the such, you'd still be able to spell

Ade



Posted by: mistermopar

Quote:
Yes, and then there's the Elvis-Bigfoot conspiracy... Keep your tinfoil hat on!

LOL...check,one tinfoil hat ,hummm wonder why my ears ring when I use the microwave......

Randy



Posted by: Keith In Kodiak

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ade
Hi John,

The Muslim Council of Great Britain is certainly not a Parliament and has no statutory powers in the UK - so while it may be unwelcome it isn't anything for most people to worry about.

Keith, you can't judge how good a 'call' something is on the number of people killed as a result.....looking back at a history book will show that the Brits killed far fewer Native Americans than the US Govt ever did.....and I'm sure most (or all?!?) the Americans here wouldn't say that the War of Independence was wrong? - it was, of course.....if you hadn't gone all petty over the price of tea and the such, you'd still be able to spell

Ade


Well, the Brits were busy killing Africans, Indians, Asians and Irish while the Americans were killing Native Americans. It was that kind of era.

And It's a good thing we kicked you out because real men drink coffee!

You can stand back and watch a war or you can pitch in and help. When the Soviets marched into Afghanistan we decided to help. We sent the Afghani's arms, equipment and food. I think it was a good call.

The fact that Ossama and the Taliban later decided to hate us is par for the course where we are concerned - after all, look at the French!



Posted by: Ade

Keith,

I hope you aren't implying that the French are ungrateful for Allied help during a war or two

Coffee....puh, real men drink beer!!

Ade



Posted by: Spakoyna

I am surprised this topic has not been brought up! Talk about changing a country! The US has become multilingual due to immigration. It irks me to no end to see our government catoring to people who want to move here but do not even want to take the time to learn our language! Anyone ever consider how much extra money the government has to spend to do this?



Posted by: Tatsy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith In Kodiak
That was a pretty good call actually. The Taliban killed far fewer people in their time in Afghanistan than the Soviets did.

Good call??? The Taliban had killed not fewer people for the capture of authority and in the subsequent long-term civil war (already without Soviets). Taliban had moved the country in a past in several centuries ago, forbidding even TV.
And now as result we have perfect Afghanistan having zero economy, terrorism and trade with drugs. And September 11 in addition.



Posted by: Eryk

>>And It's a good thing we kicked you out because real men drink coffee!

No-one kicked anyone out of your bit of the USA - you bought it from the Russians with hard cash

>>The fact that Ossama and the Taliban later decided to hate us is par for

They didn't "later decide" to hate you, they hated you from the start and their ancestors hated yours right back to the 8th century. This dance has been going on since Urban II declared the first "War on Terror" and it will continue to repeat through history until we learn that you must NEVER compromise principles for expediency or liberty for security. To quote a senior member of the Iranian Expediency Council last week: "Thank Allah our enemies are stupid."

Eryk



Posted by: Keith In Kodiak

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tats
Good call??? The Taliban had killed not fewer people for the capture of authority and in the subsequent long-term civil war (already without Soviets). Taliban had moved the country in a past in several centuries ago, forbidding even TV.
And now as result we have perfect Afghanistan having zero economy, terrorism and trade with drugs. And September 11 in addition.


Afghanistan has always been the most backwards country in the world. Afghanistan has always been a major supplier of Opium. Afghanistan has been in the midst of tribal warfare. That's what Afghans do.

And you're wrong, the Taliban killed far, far fewer people than the Soviets did in that miserable country.

Afghanistan was one of the bigger nails in the coffin of the Soviet Union. Without the defeat in Afghanistan, you might still be a Soviet and we would not be having this conversation.

It was a good call.



Posted by: Keith In Kodiak

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eryk
>>And It's a good thing we kicked you out because real men drink coffee!

No-one kicked anyone out of your bit of the USA - you bought it from the Russians with hard cash

>>The fact that Ossama and the Taliban later decided to hate us is par for

They didn't "later decide" to hate you, they hated you from the start and their ancestors hated yours right back to the 8th century. This dance has been going on since Urban II declared the first "War on Terror" and it will continue to repeat through history until we learn that you must NEVER compromise principles for expediency or liberty for security. To quote a senior member of the Iranian Expediency Council last week: "Thank Allah our enemies are stupid."

Eryk


Correct on both counts!



Posted by: deccie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith In Kodiak
Afghanistan has always been the most backwards country in the world. Afghanistan has always been a major supplier of Opium. Afghanistan has been in the midst of tribal warfare. That's what Afghans do.

And you're wrong, the Taliban killed far, far fewer people than the Soviets did in that miserable country.

Afghanistan was one of the bigger nails in the coffin of the Soviet Union. Without the defeat in Afghanistan, you might still be a Soviet and we would not be having this conversation.

It was a good call.


Keith, that's just incorrect. Afghanistan was quite advanced in the post WWII era. Sure there were as there are now lots of remote areas that have been inaccessible to anything but the most basic forms of travel but Kabul and other areas had quite a lot of infrastructure. Until the advent of the islamists they were going down a moderate path. Especially in dress and tolerance of values from other cultures. Probably similar in many ways to the moderates in Iran compared to those currently weilding the power in that country.

How long had those stone Buddahs survived that the Taliban blew up just a few years ago? That's a good indication of how intolerance has become the norm rather than the exception that it used to be.



Posted by: deccie

The Wikpedia entry is quite a good history.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Afghanistan

Note that there have been moderates in power several times.

I recall seeing some years ago a travel documentary on Kabul where they travelled to some of the best examples of architecture in Kabul and showed what the place looked like when complete and what it looked like post-taliban.

Several palaces, museums and theatres were shown.

All rubble now. The people who had lived and worked in these places were all heart broken for what they and their country had lost.

As far as I can see removal of the Taliban was a good result.

It's the one thing in current us foreign policy I agreed with all the way.

But the US still has to make the changes *work* long term and history is against them there.



Posted by: bobjf

hey people before this gets out of hand lets just say that people who immigrate to another country should accept that countrys way of life & not try to change its people or culture. put simply if you can,t accept your new country,s way of life then feel free to go home .
i,m not saying you can,t keep your culture but that,s the point it is yours not ours,you came for a chance a better way of life for 1 reason or another but it dosn,t give you the right to change your new country to what you left behind
enough said i think



Posted by: obx2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobjf
hey people before this gets out of hand lets just say that people who immigrate to another country should accept that countrys way of life & not try to change its people or culture. put simply if you can,t accept your new country,s way of life then feel free to go home .
i,m not saying you can,t keep your culture but that,s the point it is yours not ours,you came for a chance a better way of life for 1 reason or another but it dosn,t give you the right to change your new country to what you left behind
enough said i think

DITTO.



Posted by: deccie

Hi Bob,
Glad to see your getting those computer problems sorted.

The interesting thing about the comments raised here is that almost invariably they are cited by whatever culture is in the majority AT THE TIME.

The other reason they are cited is to maintain the current status quo.

As someone else once said the only thing that is constant in our world is change itself.

Some examples that look at this..

1. Former Christian Churches that are now Mosques in Turkey.
I wonder, should the Muslims give them back?

2. The "temple mount" situation in Jerusalem.

3. The legal fiction of Terra Nullius used in Australia.


Does possesion for a certain length of time legalise theft and injustice? Remember the English had a legal system that says receipt of stolen goods does not give title to those goods.. Or do you allow these things to fester and become another Balkans situation?

So Bob, I would like to pose a question to you..

Should we adopt the Aboriginal culture as Australian since they were here first? Aren't they entitled to expect us to live by their rules?

If it is majority rules then heaven help us when the immigrants are the majority and not the minority!

I don't pretend to have the answers to these questions. But sometimes things are more complicated than they first appear.



Posted by: clever1

Quote:
Originally Posted by deccie
Hi Bob,
Glad to see your getting those computer problems sorted.

The interesting thing about the comments raised here is that almost invariably they are cited by whatever culture is in the majority AT THE TIME.

The other reason they are cited is to maintain the current status quo.

As someone else once said the only thing that is constant in our world is change itself.

Some examples that look at this..

1. Former Christian Churches that are now Mosques in Turkey.
I wonder, should the Muslims give them back?

2. The "temple mount" situation in Jerusalem.

3. The legal fiction of Terra Nullius used in Australia.


Does possesion for a certain length of time legalise theft and injustice? Remember the English had a legal system that says receipt of stolen goods does not give title to those goods.. Or do you allow these things to fester and become another Balkans situation?

So Bob, I would like to pose a question to you..

Should we adopt the Aboriginal culture as Australian since they were here first? Aren't they entitled to expect us to live by their rules?

If it is majority rules then heaven help us when the immigrants are the majority and not the minority!

I don't pretend to have the answers to these questions. But sometimes things are more complicated than they first appear.


The only answer is to scrap all the planes, ships, and anything else that can cross borders, close all borders, you live where you are born, make the most of it, and be happy with what youv'e got. Can't see it happening somehow.

John



Posted by: Keith In Kodiak

Deccie,

Forward thinking or not, Afghan governments end outside the population centers. The country is largely a tribal society. It was under the Soviets, and the Taliban and under todays Karzai as well.
Kabuk can build and make pronouncements but out in the hills, the people will still be growing opium and carrying on blood feuds.



Posted by: deccie

Keith, that I do agree with!

But some parts of Pakistan are exactly the same.



Posted by: deccie

To clarify my thoughts a little better, what I have been trying to get at is the difference between seeing intolerance, injustice, discrimination, sexism and all those other *ism's and *ation's for what they really are and not cultural values at all.

After all, Western culture has changed and continues to change. Do we really want to return to the cultural values where women were denied the vote?
I wouldn't think so. Certainly not me. Do Australians want to return to a time where Aboriginals are not even counted on the census as people? Again, I think not. Those were cultural values. And they should remain in the past.

Bob, I'm very sorry you and your wife had to put up with the bullying you experienced in Sydney. Those guys should be chucked in jail. But they aren't practising their culture, they are just being bullies and should be treated as such and not allowed to get away with it.



Posted by: mistermopar

Quote:
The only answer is to scrap all the planes, ships, and anything else that can cross borders, close all borders, you live where you are born, make the most of it, and be happy with what youv'e got.


If this was to happen we wouldn't need this site any more and we wouldn't be going to the FSU to find our life mate John.Don't be thinking silly now.

Randy



Posted by: clever1

Quote:
Originally Posted by mistermopar
If this was to happen we wouldn't need this site any more and we wouldn't be going to the FSU to find our life mate John.Don't be thinking silly now.

Randy


What was I thinking .

John



Posted by: clever1

I wanted to ask our overseas friends, what are the areas like of the immigrants in your countries, by that I mean where they live in large communities.
I ask this because here in England, most of these areas are really run down, and like slums.
Just wondered if it was like that in other parts of the world ?

John



Posted by: inlove

Quote:
Originally Posted by bingism
Inlove, for an RMP Moderator you really do push the boat a little too far sometimes.

1. As I'm sure you are aware, in order to get the fiancee / spouse visa you need to prove that you "won't" be a burden on the social system! There is also a big difference between social migrancy and economic migrancy and since you are such an expert, I'm sure I need not explain such things to you.


There is no way to prove it. The truth is, even if a spouse signs an affidavite of support, it is only a temporary document. Once she becomes a citizen, even if she did not work a day in her life, she is eligible for wellfare, social security, and other benefits that all citizens enjoy. There is no way of denying them to her.
In the UK this burden starts immediately, an affidavite of support or not, because she can use your public healthcare system and state supported education system even if she does not work and pay taxes. In this sense she is a burden.

Quote:
2. If you understood the asylum process in the UK, you would understand the perception of "everything for nothing".


i don't know all the specifics, but there is the issue of people waiting for many years for their case to be heard, whithout a right for work, etc. I don't see an individual immigrant's fault here, it is more of the question of "broken system".



Posted by: inlove

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith In Kodiak
That was a pretty good call actually. The Taliban killed far fewer people in their time in Afghanistan than the Soviets did.


Unless you can prove it with numbers, I will write it down as a wishful thinking.



Posted by: inlove

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobjf
inlove a question.
a couple of weeks ago a simular thing happened in australia as in france.
forget about media hype, what realy happened was simmering resentment of what so called men of middle eastern extraction had been doing for years ie: attending the beach & other venues & creating problems, abuseing girls (including my russian step daughter & her tongan girlfriend) for wearing bikini,s & dressing like whores, even had some of these mongrels try to order several of us from ocean pool s