The Russian Meeting Place: A place to meet people and talk about all things Russian...

International Discussions about Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Travel, Music, Russian News, Ukrainian culture, Belarusian Dating, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, Kiev and other intelligent topics about life in the former Soviet Union.

     


                                

              

Pages: 1

Comrade Micheal Moore

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)


Posted by: Pawel_PL.USA

I wanted to post this in the other topics, but since they were closed here's my opinion on Moore:

Micheal Moore is a propagandist in the spirit of the best communist and Goebbelsian propagandists of socialist Russia and national socialist Germany.



Posted by: rob_we

pavel,

I like him. If you refer to Fahrenheit 911 I must say i havent seen it yet due to the fact that it is sold out here in germany since quite a while. Seems the demand is huge here. But what i saw from him is at least a very different an controverse view of topics about the states. I think it is good to show certain things from different perspectives to get a picture. So to my opinon Moore is one of the guys who is supporting a true democracy more than threatening it, in opposite to the guys that you mentioned before...



Posted by: Pawel_PL.USA

The reason it sold out in Germany is because it's anti-American ... and America is a huge obstacle in Germany's plans of throwing-off the war guilt and overturning the decisions of the Potsdam conference. Bush won't allow Germany to rebuild Mitteleuropa in Central Europe and thus any anti-American propaganda is music to German ears. Panial ?

As far as "true democracy" is concerned, Moore wants a socialist democracy which is just a mild form of bolshevism as far as I'm concerned. The difference between a commy and a social democrat is that the former just shoots you in the back of the head right away, but the latter tortures all your life - from the crib to the grave. Either way .



Posted by: Menehune

i have no personal opinion on the guy b/c i don't know him. however, I have seen his movie and i think what he did was wrong. he used his position in the film industry to voice his opinion then changing that movie into a documentary just so he can get into the oscar b/c that movie couldn't fit into other catagory.

why the oscar and film industry considered it a documentary is beyond me. that film was more fiction than james cameron's terminator movies.

the sad part is that ppl who don't know which end food enter or exit actually believe him and see this movie as fact. will those ppl pls raise their hands, i have a some snake oil that will turn dog poo into gold..



Posted by: Khashyar

Man.... this is going to be an interesting election



Posted by: Jill

I really like Michael Moore. I don't agree with everything he asserts, but it's nice to get his unique point of view on things.

BTW, my brother in law e-mailed the other day and said that Farenheit 9/11 is currently one of the most popular videos in Kiev. However, people consider it a COMEDY

My husband watched it and it made him LIKE George Bush!

What an interesting world we live in....



Posted by: Pawel_PL.USA

And in Poland, they say de ja vu, since it reminds them so much of the anti-American communist crap they were bombarded with during "real socialism".



Posted by: Jill

I acutally don''t find Michael Moore to be anti-American at all. I think he is trying to raise people's awareness of certain issues and generate debate on topics important to America.



Posted by: tjt517

I think that Moore makes some good points but he is sometimes excessive and gives credence to unprooven conspiracy theories. He is not the best critic of the war. Now that being said, I must say that I am very anti Bush and I think that he has put America into a very serious bind. I sure hope that Americans decide to fire Bush in the elections.



Posted by: rob_we

Pawel
actually I think germany is not in danger to form a 4th reich here.
In the contrary. Fashism is dead. People are quite european. The public opinion is liberal. Probably you read quite biased reports about this, which formed this kind of "extreme" opinion of yours!?
I consider the european idea, as most europeans, to be the right step. I don´t think moore is anti american. In the contrary. In america the public opinion seems to me much stronger formed by the government then over here. Moore is critical. Puts different pictures, shows other views. I do not think he is right in everything. But what he achieves is not fashism, but a talk in the streets between "normal" people. Topics are controversely discussed. And that, at least to my opinion, is the best that can happen for any democracy! Actually censorship or "burning books" is what harms it. I think you americans should be glad to have someone like him



Posted by: Jill

Quote:
I don´t think moore is anti american. In the contrary. In america the public opinion seems to me much stronger formed by the government then over here. Moore is critical. Puts different pictures, shows other views. I do not think he is right in everything. But what he achieves is not fashism, but a talk in the streets between "normal" people. Topics are controversely discussed. And that, at least to my opinion, is the best that can happen for any democracy! Actually censorship or "burning books" is what harms it. I think you americans should be glad to have someone like him






Posted by: Vyesna

I just think he's the liberal equivalent of Rush Limbaugh. Both are primarily entertainers and shouldn't be taken too seriously. It's just not egghead stuff.



Posted by: Menehune

Quote:
Originally posted by rob_we
I think you americans should be glad to have someone like him


we would be more than happy to let him emmigrate to your country

Quote:
In america the public opinion seems to me much stronger formed by the government then over here


i see just the opposite...lol in respect to the events in moore's movie and especially the war in iraq, more europeans' public opinions fell in line with their govt's position. i hope the UN food for oil allegations prove to be false, b/c if it's true and those french, german, russian govt officials really receive millions in kick backs, then we will really know who was leading whom...



Posted by: rob_we

Menehune
point one : I would love to have him here. Just send him over

point two:
I´m amazed that lots of americans are so convinced to have this ultimate "free" press, which to my opinion is not always the case.
All I can say is: If I am in us, which happens from time to time, and i happen to get news from europe (which is not always that easy) I am amazed about the differences in pure Information policy. To me the "global" view (last topic Iraq) is quite different to here. I had quite intense discussions about the "european" view (Iraq will be totally messed up, had no WMD or plans to make them, and was not at all involved in the whole Al Quaida mess) (911 attack) and the american view which was quite in opposition to it.
After all, facts seem to proove that the european "view" was much closer to the truth than the american one. No WMDs and plans, total Anarchy in Iraq now, no AL Quaida involved.
The us gov stated they were wrong (after the mess!), CIA stated they knew, hence this info was available here since before the war actually started! I didn´t see that on the news in us really at this time to be openly discussed like here... Of course there were some careful doubts but it seemed to be clear to most people, (to my feeling when i watched news over there) supported by the major news, that it was fact and prooven that this was the case (WMD,free democracy afterwards, Al Quaida involved). I do not want to go into more examples and i don´t want to start here an american-european "we are better than you" discussion. I think the advantage here lies in the fact that there are so many different gov. with so many different interrests involved so there is no general european governmental view of things.
Controverses help to discover the truth. Even in Germany, and this is true for a lot other countries here, the leading political parties are much more different then the Rep and Dem in us.
They always try to proof each other wrong to get votes for the next election, whatever topic it is about! Even the small more radical parites help here! That helps in many cases to get quite a lot information from different sides to create a more non biased opinion. And dont forget it just takes me two hours with the car to go to Czech, Poland, France, Switzerland, Austria, Netherlands, or 3 to italy, 8 to ukraine or denmark.
We travel here quite often. That also helps to get more of the whole picture. Thats a big advantage in Europe i think




Posted by: Pawel_PL.USA

Rob, you speak like a naive little liberal boy. The so-called "European idea" was and still is the German plan for dominating the European continent. Have you read Fritz Fischer's Griff nach der Weltmacht ? In English it was called "Germany's War Aims in the First World War" and it came out in 1968. The book dealt with the German plans for Mitteleuropa, meaning a German empire in Europe. These were plans shared not only by the nationalist German Right, but by most of the SPD as well !

And are you familiar with Marx and Engels' plan for organizing Central Europe. Engels believed that the German border in the East should run from the Baltic to the Adriatic, so as to include not only some Polish lands, but also all of Czechia, Austria-proper and Slovenia with Lublana. Marx agreed with this idea and both proposed that the local Slavic population would either have the choice of becoming "Deutsche proletariat", or would have to be "dealth with".

Are your eyes opening yet, Rob ?



Posted by: parasionok

Pawel,

wait a minute. Are you aware that we are in the XXI century now? What does present Germany have to do with Marx, Engels, Hitler? It is history, mate Germany is a progressive liberal country now, Germany was one of the founder of EU. Excuse me, Pawel, but you should all stop living in the past and move on. You have to look at the present picture and present situation in Europe and in the world.



Posted by: rob_we

Pavel
Maybe the year of your newspaper is 04 but before its 19 instead of 20.

Pawel we dont speak latin here, because the roman invasion was 2000 years ago, we dont speak french because Napoleon left 200 years ago. And we don´t plan a "Weltmacht" because Hitler and the 3rd Reich died 60 years ago.
I really wonder from where have your info and ideas. It just hilarious and so far from the truth as the fact that the Republicans try to establish a comunist regime in us and I think you won´t find ANY slightly political educated guy here who would support that view. Believe me, I live here.
BTW. Fritz Fischer starting the so called "Fischerkonttroverse" in the 60ies wrote about the FIRST WORLD WAR!!!!!! It was about the german emperor Wilhelm II and the military goals back then.
Pavel i assure you, WE DO NOT HAVE A GERMAN EMPEROR ANY MORE! He abdicated 1918 and died 1941



Posted by: Pawel_PL.USA

Your jeers only expose your ignorance and lack of understanding. Bismarck, Wilhelm and Hitler died, but ideas live on ... even subconsciusly. So what that "Germany is a progressive and liberal country" - that means very little, for under the skin most Germans still see the Slavs, for example, as untermenschen ... only a few will acutally admit it, though. And what does "progressivism" and "liberalism" have to do with it, anyway ???!!! The communist countries were as far to the left as one can get and yet they waged wars of conquest and agression too.



Posted by: parasionok

Pawel,

under the skin most Germans still see the Slavs, for example, as untermenschen ... only a few will acutally admit it, though.

Well, I can assure you this is not true. I have been living in Germany for 4 years already and the Germans never showed any disrespect towards me just because I am Russian. I worked for a German company and in no way there was any discrimination. Of course those Slavs who immigrate to Germany, live off taxpayers money, not willing to work are treated respectively. Maybe all the Germans manage to hide their anti-Slavic moods, but if they do, they do it impeccably well. What I noticed is totally different here. The Germans still feel huge quilt for WWII and sometimes they are even too much with it.

Also I cannot see how Hitlers ideas still live in the souls of the Germans, on the contrary.

Anyway, do you truly believe that Germany is planning to envade Europe and establish a German empire? Are you sure?



Posted by: rob_we

pavel
I´m just amazed that you seem to be really seroius with that...
Again the only source I ever saw spreading this kind of ideas were some weird comics. Just come over and see. Talk to people here thats by the way true for most european countries...
Actually with our army now germany wouldn´t even be able to conquer liechtenstein even if it would intend to do so



Posted by: Pawel_PL.USA

Well, Parasionok - that's you. But I've heard and read different. For example, it happens quite often that when there are relationships between Polish men and German women and children happen to be born from such marriages, the German party always gets the children and even when the Polish party has visitation rights, the German bureaucrats still demand that the Polish party always speak German with the children, or else - lose visitation rights. Germanization 2004 ?!

I understand that you Russians may feel a bit differently and that there was almost always a strong Germanophile faction in Russia, but we Poles have been the victims of constant German aggression East - Drang nach Osten - for all of our history and we know those Germans well and what makes them tick.

And Rob, they don't have to arm and wage war. Why do so, when they can take over economically and politically by buying up the economies of Poland and the Czech Republic and "investing" in pro-German political factions and ideas. Even Lady Thatcher noticed that this is happening in Central Europe right now.



Posted by: wavetossed

I bought the DVD of his movie "Bowling for Columbine". This was the funniest movie I have seen in years. I can't remember when I laughed so hard.

I've only seen a couple of short clips from his Fahrenheit one but it seems like he has continued his unique brand of humor. I notice a lot of people reading his books on the train here in London.



Posted by: parasionok

Pawel,

I don't know who were telling you this stuff really. I can tell you only from my personal experience: my friend (Russian woman) who was married with a German guy and after their divorce her kid lived together with the farther. I think it was a mutual decision. Her daughter was visiting her every day and they spoke only Russian. Nobody forced her to speak German to the kid. I have never heard anything like what you said before.

As for the Russians being pro-German, it is not true. Even though I live in Germany now, it is not because I love this country. I work here. Most of my friends are expats from the UK, Canada, Australia, USA: they are here for the very same reason: they work here. And btw, I don't particularaly like Germany very much, and I actually cannot believe I am defending this country but I do it because what you are saying is not particularly right. I live here and I have a more accurate picture I believe. When I was in Moscow, I didn't know much about Germany. My plans were just to go here and work for a while as my objective was to live in different countries. Before I worked in USA, England, and Hungary. But it happened that I met my bf in Germany so it seems like I am stuck here, hopefully for a long long time



Posted by: rob_we

Pawel
seriously now. Who are you talking to??? Who tells you this crap????? I am german with my family roots to czech and poland. I have a company in germany in czech 50/50 run by me and a czech company.
...and this family has to speak german story??? On what juristical base??? Nobody forces parents to speak whatever language with their children. I have a daughter i speak german and english with her. My beauty speaks russian and english with her. NO authorities here would have a problem with this, in the contrary. Maybe you missunderstood. Of course kids have to learn german and english in normal german schools. thats fine to me and usual in any country...

..and about the buyout of eastern europe. Thats capitalism. Actually lots of german companies a fully or partially owned by us companies GF Chrisler/Merceds Opel/GM etc. etc.
That started after the war. Do you think the us intended to conquer europe by doing this?????

Pavel sorry mate, but just talk to people from HERE. Go here and make yourself a picture. ...and by the way, is´t this what i was talking about concerning unbiased information about other countries in US?



Posted by: wavetossed

Pawel, pawel, pawel,

You have struck a nerve. You said:

...that means very little, for under the skin most Germans still
see the Slavs, for example, as untermenschen

But you provide no evidence. However, there is ample evidence on this board that AMERICANS see the slavs, especially Russians, as untermenschen. You need to look in your own backyard and not build up fantasies about terrible things in places where you don't even live. Germany is probably the most socialist country in Europe today. Not politically, but culturally. Almost any groups of socialist activists in Europe will be dominated by Germans because there are a lot of Germans with strong socialists views.

The extreme fascist philosophy of Hitler has found a new home in the USA and in Russia, but fortunately their numbers are small.



Posted by: rob_we

Wave
very true...
and even self-employed people like me can vote here for the green party for example

By the way our minister for inner affairs Otto Schilly is the former lawyer of "Andreas Bader" one of the heads of RAF in the 70ies.
Our international most respected foreign minister Joschka Fischer was one of the main guys in the anti nuklear, anti atomic and peace movement in the 80ies. A rebell!! I was standing in the crowd listening to him back then. To claim these guys to be fashists is as to tell mother theresa to be a hooker.
Actually im very proud of this being possible here. And the guys seem to do quite a good job



Posted by: Menehune

Quote:
Originally posted by rob_we
(Iraq will be totally messed up, had no WMD or plans to make them, and was not at all involved in the whole Al Quaida mess) (911 attack) and the american view which was quite in opposition to it. After all, facts seem to proove that the european "view" was much closer to the truth than the american one. No WMDs and plans, total Anarchy in Iraq now, no AL Qaeda involved.


rob, before you read any of this, i just want you to know that i am not attacking you personally.

i hope you have read the 209 pages audit by Defense Contract Audit Agency(DCAA) & Defense Contract Management Agency Off Pricing Evaluation Team (DCMA). but from your quote above, it's apparent that you haven't read it or any other commisioned audits like the one done by the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA).

in the report, it states that there are evidence the UN food for oil program awarded contract to Liechtenstein Trust (german), a front that funnel money to al quaida and is on the UN's watchlist. that is just one of many contracts that was awarded to known terrorist organzitions. want another? how bout Malaysian Swiss Gulf and African Chamber(MIGA), MIGA is a company that the UN and the U.S. says has served as a hub of Al Qaeda finance: A terrorist chamber of commerce. its chief founder and longtime president, Ahmed Idris Nasreddin, landed on the U.N. watchlist of entities and individuals belonging to, or affiliated with Al Qaeda. the list goes on and on regarding contracts awarded to individuals or intities, who has ties or links with palestinian terrorist and al qaeda. then in july an iraq official, Ehsan Karim, head of the Finance Ministry's audit board probing into the oil for food scandal was assassinated. I wonder what those in envolved are trying to hide. conspiracy theory anyone? lol

the DCMA is probably bias in it's report. Like i said earlier, I am gonna wait until the offical UN audit is completed. if it shows no links of money filtering down to terrorist groups such as al qaeda, then i will swallow my pride and say you were right all along bob. but if the UN's audit re-iterates the DCMA and CPA, then we will truely know what the european view consisted of when it came to iraq.

your statment "and by the way, is´t this what i was talking about concerning unbiased information about other countries in US?" is just the typical european stereotype about americans. i vist s. america, asia, europe and even africa every year b/c of business. i get a dose of news from 5 continents but my concentration is in the asian pacific basin, thus i live in hawaii, the hub of east and west exchange and business. we may be ignorant fools to you. but believe me, the majority of us are not as blind as you may preceive us to be.

americans are not as ignorant as you think we are with you bantering. eventhough i live in hawaii, i bet i watch more intl news than those who think we are close-minded. you say it's difficult to get intl news in the US. that's just pure bolony. here in hawaii, i receive dw.tv ( both german and english version), bcc world, fnn (fuji news network), sbn (saigon broadcasting network), abc (australian broadcasting channel), news from china and taiwan in both manderian and cantonese. I read the ashahi shinbun (japanese newspaper), india times, and wall street journal (europe edition). with the exception of dw.tv, i watch the other networks in their native tongues. i am trying not to compare with the news network you watch b/c it's unfair with you having more neighbors than myself being in the middle of the pacific. i am just trying to show you that americans are not dimb-wits as you think with your constant stereotying of us, ware ware americajin. news is news, it will always be objective from the reporters POV. it's the same when i switch on dw.tv or bbc, it's as bias as you claim american news are.

I don't know what your idea of the european view is. but this is my take on the european view. since you did your stereotyping of us, i will make one for you of how some americans see europeans. i have been to europe many times and i've been treated very badly b/c i am an american and more so b/c i am asian. especially in germany and france, i don't think i will ever visit there again unless i have to. well, i was deported from germany so i don't have a choice in the matter. wave said that hitler's ideas have moved to our shores. this may be true but it still exist in germany more so then in the US, but many there will just deny it, deny deny everything when it suits them. that is my take on the european view, turn a blind eye when it suits them. that's why scandals and such are not a big deal over there. i've experienced it first hand when a group of neo-nazi skin heads tried to attack me b/c i was with a german woman. unfortunately for them, they didn't know that a rolled up magazine can beat you to a bloody pulp. and of course, i was at fault, b/c the police didn't want to admit it was a racially motivated attack and pushed everything under the rug, then i was deported. imagine that, 1 small asian man attacking 5 big burly skin heads, the bigger you are, the harder you fall. i've never had to use my martial arts before or since and hope i will never have to again, but i am sure glad i've studied kendo for over 25 years and wish i had my shinai or even a katana with me at the time. this was a few years back about a month before a muslim immigration housing complex was attacked and burned by skin heads. that incident however wasn't so easy to push under the rug. something similar happened in france but it was a verbal assult.

i am sure the majority of germans are friendly and nice like those i met while backpacking in spain and like urself bob (no pun intended mate). should i stereotype all germans from my experience, like you did with americans b/c you were unfortunate enough to be in someplace that can only received the cartoon network. i am in hawaii and I received dw.tv and bbc world on regular cable. you can receive those 2 networks in every hotel around the world. even here i receive newspaper from 3 continents on the same day (kinda help being last on the intl date line). maybe i should be wary of all germans b/c an attack is ominate?

do not worry pawel, germany's economy is not gonna swallow up anyone. the EU will be the death of many european economies. that's why my concentration is in asia. it's like wave said germany is the most socialistic in europe. why he's proud of that, i have no idea. company can't even go bankrupt and move out of a losing position without the labor union suing them to remain operational even at a loss. take the opel strike in germany right now... oh wait, i am not suppose to know that. errrrr how did this ignorant american know there was a strike b/c of downsizing consideration at the opel plants, that can cost the jobs of 1 out 4 employees.

let's just keep bantering each other and see how anti-american or anti-european we can become.



Posted by: rob_we

Menehune
i said this in another thread aleady. How can i in any way ever criticize anything of the divine us.

I said:
(Iraq will be totally messed up, had no WMD or plans to make them, and was not at all involved in the whole Al Quaida mess) (911 attack) and the american view which was quite in opposition to it.

Ok i know its all wrong. Iraqi people did never better then now....right?

Of course you have a point:
you wrote:
in the report, it states that there are evidence the UN food for oil program awarded contract to Liechtenstein Trust (german), a front that funnel money to al quaida and is on the UN's watchlist.

Bravo. You prooved that europe esp. Germany is the main reason fort it! No further comment...
thats the way of dicussion i am used to. Stick to the point....

You was deported from germany, because you defended a german woman agains the rots of skinheads bashing any foreigner here. Bravo again. Happens every day here! Our airports a full of deported foreigners who were not able to speak "Heil" with the right pronounciation..no comment

and i know you have a lot of tv channels that of course gives you a much deeper input about a country than stupid bold germans could have who live here for 40 years! Agreed
Maybe I was so occupied bashing foreigners, so i could not watch the news. Good point

Of course you will tell me in your next post a lot of the backgrounds of the burning lets call it "faschist Schillys new Reichskristallnacht ok?"

you said:
wave said that hitler's ideas have moved to our shores. this may be true but it still exist in germany more so then in the US, but many there will just deny it, deny deny everything when it suits them.

and thats where my post will end. This ignorant blunt way of selfoverestimation with no facts but pure ******** no real knowledge, and not even the slightest approach to find out what really goes on made the iraq war happen, and is the reason why maybe europeans were "not so friendly" to you

no i have to go. I have to practice killing jews and still have to get in my black uniform...



Posted by: BradIL

Fahrenheit 911--

Christopher Hitchens so thoroughly picked apart this film its amazing its seen with any credibility at all.

Does it comport with any fact at all, cohere at any point it asserts?

There is one thing Michael Moore overlooked. When he uses the video clips to build to the night of big bombing in Baghdad, along with the kids & kites, shoppers, etc., he could have included a clip of a mother nursing a newborn in the middle of one of the palaces--- right before it gets clobbered by laser guiding bomb. That would have been effective.

But the Carlyle Group wouldn't sit still for it, I guess.



Posted by: BradIL

Rob_We if the european view is close to the truth, then you need to defend that view.

No WMD, why do troops in Iraq find chemical shells with sarin? Why are there aluminum tubes used for uranium enrichment? Why is Saddam trying to buy a missle system & missile production system from North Korea, in ready to assemble form?

How can europe's view be taken seriously when in the past week-10 days the Times of London discloses that officials in Russia's government, diplomats in the U-N, a company linked with French President Jacques Chirac were all taking bribes from the U-N Oil for Food program. There is one article indicating that of the $64 billion sold in that program from 1996-2003, more than $10 billion was siphoned off illegally, some of which ended up in bribes. Later this week one account says Germany may have received bribes from the program.

Congress could have its report on Oil for Food ready for release later this month, and word is, its pretty harsh on european countries for taking money from Saddam that was earned from illegal oil sales.

You knew Saddam so well... so how do you account for the hundreds of thousands of bodes buried in mass graves in southern Iraq?



Posted by: BradIL

Iraq & Al-Qaida are not linked?

Depends on whether you believe the intelligence agents of the Czech Republic. Five officials in that service have sworn all along they observed Mohammed Atta meeting with an Iraqi Intelligence operative. You either believe them or you don't.

Have we all forgotten that those in the cells that pulled off 1993 bombing at the WTC parking garage, carried Iraqi passports when they entered the U-S? Including Ramzi Yousef, I believe. the 93 bombing was an Al-Qaida operation.



Posted by: wavetossed

How can a thread about a maker of comedy films like Bowling for Columbine and Fahrenheit 9/11 degrade into an argument about whether or not Al Qaeda did or did not do certain actions in concert with certain other organizations/governments?

Michael Moore is a comedian just like George Carlin or Billy Connolly. Their work is supposed to make you lighten up and laugh at yourself and think about why you do the things you do. It's not supposed to start arguments and wars.



Posted by: tjt517

Regardless of what people go around saying it is a known fact that Saddam and Ben Laden were enemies not allies. They had completely different ideas and hated each other. Bush and his friends at Fox news have many times tried to come up with a connection and it has always come to nothing. The WMD claims have come to nothing. It was not because of intelligence failures as many say. It was a known fact that the weapons inspectors had destroyed at least 98% of Iraq's WMD before the war. Micheal Moore is guilty of exaggeration at times but in no way does that lead to any credibility for Bush. Bush deceived America with his actions. The war in Iraq is the equivalent of if America had invaded China in response to Pearl Harbor. That is how bad the decision to go to war in Iraq was.



Posted by: rob_we

BradIl
A very popular opinion about this topic Al Quaida-Iraq basd on most middle east experts here and supported by The New york times Article in june 2003 is no cooperation between Al Quaida and Saddam. It is thought here, that this was an invention of the us gov as the WMD!
After imprisoning of Khalid Scheich Mohammed und Abu Subaida
and questioning them both denied any cooperation (Both high Al Quaida Leaders) . Due to the enormus religious differences between Saddam and Osama bin Laden this is to the experts here quite likely!
No proof was found. Thats the view here....
But wave is right. Its not a point to be discussed here anyway.
Neither is Germany of course.
And the "truth" is something that everybody claims for himself quite differently.

Whatever paper you read it seems to change. Everybody has to make his own conclusions....

The problem of discussing is that you state arguments.
Sorry I lost it again with my last post, but being on the other side of the world may give you a different picture. Maybe I do see things all wrong here and in russia. Still Im not convinced....



Posted by: Menehune

Quote:
Originally posted by rob_we
[B]Bravo. You prooved that europe esp. Germany is the main reason fort it! No further comment...
thats the way of dicussion i am used to. Stick to the point....


i didn't accuse germany, i gave two examples of allegations in the report, i purposely used the liechenstein truss to irk you and it worked b/c you following post is full of selfrighteous BS. if you can't debate then go suck a lolly.

my point. right after your post that claims US public opinion is form by the govt, more so than in europe, assuming we are mindless cattle being lead. that we get bias news here b/c it's nearly impossible to get intl news, assuming we are so insular. my throwing news network around was to show you that eventhough i live in a state with the population size of say odessa and the size of hill on the world map, we are not as insular as you may think.

Quote:
and i know you have a lot of tv channels that of course gives you a much deeper input about a country than stupid bold germans could have who live here for 40 years! Agreed
Maybe I was so occupied bashing foreigners, so i could not watch the news. Good point


you have no more of an idea who americans are, than i of germans b/c you don't live here to make such assumptions as you have. exactly like what wave said to brad's assumptions of germany and from your exact quote.

critize the US govt and foreign policies all you want, that is your right as citizen of the world. but there is a distinquish difference between the ppl and it's govt, i am affronted when the two are associated as one.

"The problem of discussing is that you state arguments.
Sorry I lost it again with my last post, but being on the other side of the world may give you a different picture. Maybe I do see things all wrong here and in russia. Still Im not convinced...."

yes i made arguements just like in debating during college and in law school. i never said you see things wrong and i see things right. i did say that all news are bias from the reporters point of view, if that POV is liberal or christian demorcratic or wave's green party, then the news will reflect that. btw, i rarely watch fox and fox is owned by rupert murdoch, who owns rueters, and have a virtual monopoly on news info so i try to avoid rueters sourced news. so your a socialist and i am a capitalist, of course we're not, but we will have a different world view b/c of our distance. just as my world view is different from those on the US mainland. the US is bigger than europe, our world view will vary from state to state as much as europeans from country to country. you can't go and group americans as a whole, just like i can't with my thug assult example. and i never grouped you with them.. i only asked, should I group all germans and europeans from my experiences as you have from your american experiences.



Posted by: rob_we

Menehune

ok lets continue

I was about 50 times or more in America (i usually fly there twice a year since 1981). I spent all in all more then a year there!
I run a business in the US. I was never deported from the us!
Nor from Austria, Switzerland, France, Netherlands, Poland, Ukraine,Russia,Czech,Italy, Spain, Portugal,Turkey,Greece, Canada, Mexico or any other country i ever visited or did business with! I have lots of american friends, and even more business friends in the us!
How long have you been in Germany before you was deported?
Sorry pal, I do not know anyone Us citizen or other Foreigner, who was EVER deported from germany! See, believe it or not its quite a civilized country! To be deported here as a us citizen means you are convicted having done a crime here! Nobody gets deported because hes defending german women.
I don´t know what you did mate, but don´t even try to sell me
this!
Actually you know whats funny too? I do not know anybody of my friends who was ever harrased by punks or skins you said. Germany is a country where you can walk allone at midnight anywhere without having to be afraid to be harmed.
People are friendly in this country as in all eurpoean countries to foreigners, especially to brits or us citizens, because almost anybody speaks at least some english!
Of course due to your "lifetime" experience here you know better,
but what you claim to be a debate, is nothing but justification of something you definitely did wrong while being here!
Sorry mate suck the lolly yourself! And be proud of all that knowledge you have. We had this way of "debating" here too. Just some time ago.

you said:
i hope you have read the 209 pages audit by Defense Contract Audit Agency(DCAA) & Defense Contract Management Agency Off Pricing Evaluation Team (DCMA).

Why? Have you read the "Bericht des deutschen Aussenministeriums zur Lage im Irak?"
Have you read any european report? Why do you assume that anybody non us who wants to talk about this topic has to read a paper done by the US gov to see whats going on there.
The US gov is prooved to lie about several cases in the matter. They even ADMITTED that due to international pressure!
Why doe you expect anyone to read this just because its done in US? I think you wont get my point anyway but I consider this to be again quite ignorant! Do you think anyone needs the us gov papers to know whats going on in europe Africa or asia?
We have quite sophisticated french newschannels here, who actually have decades of knowledge and experience in middle east. What about that. What have you read or seen there?
BBC is british. the british view in this special matter is quite equal to the us! So I speak german frech and english enough to understand the news in europe? What about you?


BTW my words were:
"In america the public opinion seems to me much stronger formed by the government then over here."

You understand "seems to me?"

Thats my opinion my experience not from the TV but live! And I won´t shut up just because you think that those who scream louder are more right!



Posted by: Menehune

let's see.. i speak japanese (kanto and kansai dialect), vietnamese (bac and nam dialect), chinese (mandarian and cantonese dialect), english of course like you, and some korean.. my expertise is in asia so i speak many asian language, ur's is in europe so you speak more european language. so what's your point, i speak more foreign laugauges than you..

let's see.. i studied 2 years abroad, 1 year at leeds uni, another in osaka.. have trekked around europe enough to equal around 2 years total in europe.. so what's your point, i've stayed in europe longer than you have in the US.. germany is bout the size of alaska or texas, how many times have you been to alaska or texas? or hawaii for that matter.

i never claimed i know better or more about europeans than you do and i re-iterate that in my second post if you bothered to read it. i only claim that you don't know any more about americans than i do about of european for you to be generalizing. if your so knowledgable about americans, then you would know what is the most pressing issue in hawaii. but you don't b/c issues from state to state differ as they will from country to country in europe b/c of distance.

yes go depend on french sources on mideast region, they are such experts that they helped screwed up the whole region in the first place with their colonization and division of the mideast after the paris peace treaty. just like how they screwed up vietnam.

go ahead and shout louder than me, if that's your style. mine falls more under asian thoughts. silence is golden, those who need to shout have less to say thus they need to raise their voice to be heard..



Posted by: tjt517

This is listed on the section of topics unrelated to Russia but actually this issue is very important for Russia. Russia has been a major beneficiary of the war on terrorism and also the war in Iraq(the two wars are very different things). Before 9/11 Russia was often criticized for the Chechnya war. 9/11 changed the world and that criticism is much less often voiced today. The Iraq war has divided America and Western Europe. This division has historically been a major goal of Russian foreign policy. The division is such that there is very little time left to criticize the growing authoritarianism in Russia. Some Russia experts have speculated that the government in Moscow wants Bush to win the election for ulterior motives. Bush is a polarizing figure and it is unlikely that he will ever have a good relationship with Western Europe and this works to Russia's advantage. This next point is more of a personal opinion but I believe that America is going to loose the war in Iraq and this will also work to increase Russian power. This is not to say that Russia will again be the power that it once was. It is only to say that geo political events of the last few years have strengthened Russia dramatically.



Posted by: Menehune

tj, you have a very good point there. i think americans and europeans are usually polarized at opposite poles on many issues. the topic of iraq war just made it more apparent as it have done here.



Posted by: BradIL

wavetossed writes:
Michael Moore is a comedian just like George Carlin or Billy Connolly. Their work is supposed to make you lighten up and laugh at yourself and think about why you do the things you do. It's not supposed to start arguments and wars.

Lighten up? Why in 'Fahrenheit' does he leave the camera square in a woman's face as she grieves for her deceased son? Since you're so perceptive you could explain the humor or levity associated with this scene.



Posted by: BradIL

Rob_we writes: A very popular opinion about this topic Al Quaida-Iraq basd on most middle east experts here and supported by The New york times Article in june 2003 is no cooperation between Al Quaida and Saddam. It is thought here, that this was an invention of the us gov as the WMD!

The U-S 9-11 commission concluded there was no evidence that indicated that Iraq had a collaborative relationship that helped plan, implement, or execute the 9-11 attacks with Al-Qaida. The commission did, in fact, determine a relationship between Iraq &
Al-Qaida did exist, but they were unable to clearly describe what that relationship was. An invention of the U-S goverment of WMD??? No, I believe that was clearly covered by the weapons inspection programs that since the gulf war armistice in 1991.

This is not relevant to a Michael Moore thread? This goes to part of the, whatever it is, that is displayed at movie theatres the world over.

We are left with aluminimum tubes used in uranium enrichment, shells with sarin gas, and Al-Qaida terrorists using Iraqi passports to enter the U-S in 1993.



Posted by: rob_we

Guys.
The commission is most probably the right source to proof anything! US proofed germany is fashistic. US proofed, Saddam and Bin Laden were Pals. US proofed they had WMD. US proofed that all was done for the sake of humanity god freedom and democracy... US proofed all the bad thinghs in the world are done somwhere else.
Im glad for you guys , and tired....
Live in the land of the free and the brave. I envy you for your believe...



Posted by: rob_we

BradIL.

you sent me a private mail. I was trying to respond to it, but it seems technically not possible. Im only alllowed to send 1000 letters and my response has more than that. Im not able to splitt the letter because of the fact, that your mailbox is full.
But I want to answer your letter. I do not post it here, because you sent it private and I do not know if you wish that ot not.

By the way i don´t believe in this "private letter" issue.
If there is something to discuss, lets do it publicly!
This is a off tipic chit/chat related to moore and the Iraq war issue.
I think we CAN discuss this here if you wish!

My opinion:

I deny revenge policy, death penalty, and any kind of offensive war. (actually any kind of war)

I deny anyone, even the divine US has any right to do this.

I support Schroeder by being brave enough, against international pressure to say germany will NOT participate.

I deny the us gov have the right to alter international law whenever they like.

I deny that this war did good for anyone. Not for Iraq not for europe not for us.

By the way I think its funny in a way that Saddam has changed so much all of a sudden! He was an ally of the us as long as he followed what he was told! After desert storm one (Georges daddy) he was almost defeated by his own people. The US military withdraw, handed him back all weapons, gave him even strategical necessary air sovereignty to bash this riot in Iraq back then.

Why? To my opinion because it was not in the interrest of the us gov and never will be, that this country will be independant. Read the interview with General Schwarzkopf about this topic...

After refusing to lower the oilprice, and attacking Kuwait (as opec president and after several warnings), because they bowed to us pressure and broke international OPEC agreements... he all of a sudden became the evil of the world....

CNN showed a video back then made by an US advertizing company, where Iraqi soldiers threw children out of the windows of a hospital, to "encourage" the US pro war opinion.

All the "facts" stated by the US gov to attack Iraq were proved wrong by the rest of the worlds experts. But of course they are, as non us guys all idiots.

Now this ridiculous friendship issue with Bin Laden started!

No forein, non us middle east expert neither most of us experts supports this!

If you want to follow your oil guys (of course its just accidentally that most leaders in the us gov were in the oil business before ) do so, just please do not try to convince the rest of the world with these "facts". I personally don´t think so. I think you guys are mislead, after making my own opinion about the whole story, and I think (as one of the Nürnberg Trial public prosecutors about the "common guilt of the german population" "you would have been able to see through all this propaganda") . He was right. My believe.

I do not think the us gov protects freedom or humanity with all this, and I will never vote for anyone who acts against international law. I believe in democracy! And i always will. If that means painful negotiation with totalitarian regimes, I vote for this.



Posted by: Pawel_PL.USA

Quote:
I don't know who were telling you this stuff really. I can tell you only from my personal experience: my friend (Russian woman) who was married with a German guy and after their divorce her kid lived together with the farther. I think it was a mutual decision. Her daughter was visiting her every day and they spoke only Russian. Nobody forced her to speak German to the kid. I have never heard anything like what you said before.


Parasionok, you're only talking about the situation of Russians. Do you know anything about the situation of Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs etc. etc. ? The only reason the Krauts treat Russians with more respect is because Russia is a world power.

Quote:
I am german


And that pretty much explains you're attitude.

Quote:
..and about the buyout of eastern europe. Thats capitalism.


He he, "capitalism" - - that's easy to say, but let's call things by their name - DRANG NACH OSTEN.

Quote:
Pavel sorry mate, but just talk to people from HERE. Go here and make yourself a picture. ...and by the way, is´t this what i was talking about concerning unbiased information about other countries in US?


You Germans are incorrigible ! Next thing you're going to tell me is that Poland started World War II and invaded Germany.



Posted by: rob_we

Pawel
there is no special law for foreigners, concerning parental treatment. Its done in the same way for everyone.
... and there is of course no different treatment of poles, russians, italians,swedes. Its all handled in the same way here.

Pawel you are polish so I can understand your fear or anger. I think the things that happened in the past WERE quite bad.
I understand what you have been told from your parents and grandparents. Due to this belief you have a reason to mistrust.
See i have a bright pretty wonderful little daughter.
Its now the 5th generation after the war happened. The 5th generation that had learned things. And also learned about fashism, about intolerance, about how much pain mislead and indifferent people can cause to others. I do not want my daughter to be accused to be fashist, Nazi intolerant etc. etc.
I want her to understand that war is bad. Anytime and everywhere! I want her to understand that discrimination and the censoring of ideas or thoughts is bad. I don´t want her to be accused of all these things. I hope that when she´s grown up, she will have polish russian, american, english friends and show them thats its possible for anybody and any nation to move on and to learn....



Posted by: Jutman

And when carlsberg take over BBH in Petersburg, renault send their designer to Lada, Ecco build a factory in Slovakia its Germany moving east??? (and this list is VEERRRYYY long)

If Germany wants to build a new a Empire, its strange that they are that country who less money of GDP at Military (about 1%) where USA use more than 4%.

About the war in Iraq. All governments has their own agenda, and its just happen that the German, French did not match the American. Period !!!. It has nothing to do with anti-americanism or something like that.

---

About the Michael Moore movie. Its not a big secret, whats his opinon is, he just had the chance to make a movie about. Frankly there was a programme here in Denmark, indicates he was almost a copycat, since a programme earlier than the movie showed many of the issues in his movie (showed at a American station)

I think many Europeans find its sometimes amusing, because we consider the politicals in USA so different from what we use to and then it is almost like entainment.

---

Censorhip take place is all countries, in different shapes. In USA, like when the administration 'asked' the media not to show some news. Now I understand that there is very little about the success in Iraq, since a dead soldier sell better.
In Russia its no secret there is strong central control.
- and I think the media, at least in Northern Europe has also a hidden agenda. In example the war in Cheznya, where our approach is the humanistic and 'forget' the feelings many Russian has towards this, and therefore is very critical towards Russia.

BUT

What most peolpe understand, is that there is big difference between goverments and individuals. There is good and bad people in ALL countries, and will be that even the there is a new administration.



Posted by: lolomarseille

Quote:
Originally posted by Menehune
let's see.. i speak japanese (kanto and kansai dialect), vietnamese (bac and nam dialect), chinese (mandarian and cantonese dialect), english of course like you, and some korean.. my expertise is in asia so i speak many asian language, ur's is in europe so you speak more european language. so what's your point, i speak more foreign laugauges than you..

let's see.. i studied 2 years abroad, 1 year at leeds uni, another in osaka.. have trekked around europe enough to equal around 2 years total in europe.. so what's your point, i've stayed in europe longer than you have in the US.. germany is bout the size of alaska or texas, how many times have you been to alaska or texas? or hawaii for that matter.

i never claimed i know better or more about europeans than you do and i re-iterate that in my second post if you bothered to read it. i only claim that you don't know any more about americans than i do about of european for you to be generalizing. if your so knowledgable about americans, then you would know what is the most pressing issue in hawaii. but you don't b/c issues from state to state differ as they will from country to country in europe b/c of distance.

yes go depend on french sources on mideast region, they are such experts that they helped screwed up the whole region in the first place with their colonization and division of the mideast after the paris peace treaty. just like how they screwed up vietnam.

go ahead and shout louder than me, if that's your style. mine falls more under asian thoughts. silence is golden, those who need to shout have less to say thus they need to raise their voice to be heard..



well, cantonese is not a dialect but a different langage, and the story of first vietnam war is not exactly what you wrote

do you know giap is still alive?



Posted by: lolomarseille

Quote:
Originally posted by Pawel_PL.USA
Parasionok, you're only talking about the situation of Russians. Do you know anything about the situation of Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs etc. etc. ? The only reason the Krauts treat Russians with more respect is because Russia is a world power.



And that pretty much explains you're attitude.



He he, "capitalism" - - that's easy to say, but let's call things by their name - DRANG NACH OSTEN.



You Germans are incorrigible ! Next thing you're going to tell me is that Poland started World War II and invaded Germany.


Pawel, about beginning of WW2, we died for dantzig, it should have be better to began to die for praha and spanish republic; after pilsudski(a great man!), all poles leaders of the second republic were bunch of idiots(aaah, ambassador lukasiewiecz cable to warsaw"as i live in berlin, be sure that german people will uprise against hitler at the first day of our victorious war")
now, some poles go on this stupid nationalist policy ( history university, leather jackets,eeh?)
you think that american will protect you? you're naive
if you don't stop this attitude against german, may be you will loose all(again)
btw, about drang nach osten, there was a big pole one against ukrainian, belarus and lithuania, don't?)



Posted by: lolomarseille

Quote:
Originally posted by wavetossed
Pawel, pawel, pawel,

You have struck a nerve. You said:

...that means very little, for under the skin most Germans still
see the Slavs, for example, as untermenschen

But you provide no evidence. However, there is ample evidence on this board that AMERICANS see the slavs, especially Russians, as untermenschen. You need to look in your own backyard and not build up fantasies about terrible things in places where you don't even live. Germany is probably the most socialist country in Europe today. Not politically, but culturally. Almost any groups of socialist activists in Europe will be dominated by Germans because there are a lot of Germans with strong socialists views.

The extreme fascist philosophy of Hitler has found a new home in the USA and in Russia, but fortunately their numbers are small.


except last phrase wich is too hard, i vote for you!



Posted by: lolomarseille

Quote:
Originally posted by Pawel_PL.USA
Rob, you speak like a naive little liberal boy. The so-called "European idea" was and still is the German plan for dominating the European continent. Have you read Fritz Fischer's Griff nach der Weltmacht ? In English it was called "Germany's War Aims in the First World War" and it came out in 1968. The book dealt with the German plans for Mitteleuropa, meaning a German empire in Europe. These were plans shared not only by the nationalist German Right, but by most of the SPD as well !

And are you familiar with Marx and Engels' plan for organizing Central Europe. Engels believed that the German border in the East should run from the Baltic to the Adriatic, so as to include not only some Polish lands, but also all of Czechia, Austria-proper and Slovenia with Lublana. Marx agreed with this idea and both proposed that the local Slavic population would either have the choice of becoming "Deutsche proletariat", or would have to be "dealth with".


a saw a lot of people like you dead in bosnia
unfortunately, not only people like you

2 solutions:
1you're a provoker ( from what?)
2time machine works, you're the proof
Are your eyes opening yet, Rob ?




Posted by: mria

Quote:
Originally posted by Pawel_PL.USA
I wanted to post this in the other topics, but since they were closed here's my opinion on Moore:

Micheal Moore is a propagandist in the spirit of the best communist and Goebbelsian propagandists of socialist Russia and national socialist Germany.


Thank god somebody else sees through this Michael Moore. I like him because he explained that the war in Iraq was wrong, and illegal and unjustified BUT the US foreign policy in Israel is an even bigger disgrace.
I think his film was a smoke screen. Moore has tried to make everyone quietly forget about the horrors that Israel is inflicting on Palestine, which is creating a breed of desperate teenagers who have no homes and families who are happily willing to do anything for their plight. He's tried to go completely off topic.
Why is everyone IGNORING ISRAEL AND PALESTINE and the direct connection to terrorism?????????????????????????????????
Thats why I'm glad Kerry wasn't voted in. He has even stronger views about supporting Israel than Bush. Thank God he wasn't voted in then, or we'd have more terrorists on our hands.
At least with Bush, there are some attempts at looking at the disgrace that Israel has become and there is no censorship at the moment about what is happening there.
Since reading Kerry's views on Israel, I never thought I'd say this, but I've warmed towards Bush.



Posted by: lolomarseille

oooh please, don't make the things more polemistic(?) and unclear
even if it is true that Rep as less servants of Israeli policy than Dem ( example: james Baker)
Well, world terrorism is no more palestinian, even their islamist are on a national policy
but palestinian/israeli serial is a wonderfull argument in the mouth of all anti-western and anti democratic activist in the world, and specially in arab world, yes



Posted by: mria

Quote:
Originally posted by lolomarseille

Well, world terrorism is no more palestinian, even their islamist are on a national policy
but palestinian/israeli serial is a wonderfull argument in the mouth of all anti-western and anti democratic activist in the world, and specially in arab world, yes [/B]


Hi Lolomarseille,
Yeah, you are right. When I look at it like that, it does sort of sound like I am assuming Palestinians are terrorists:eek I just think its not fair, and it drives me mad that its being ignored. I just keep imagining how I would feel if a group of Arabs came to my country of Wales and said:
"Sorry, you have to leave your country, even though your people have lived here for thousands of years. We have a book that says this is our land, and you have to do what we say and leave your houses because we've got a big superpower on our side, giving us money to do this and the world is not going to listen to you. so move aside, please. By the way we've got illegal weapons of mass destruction too, but thats okay, because we've got a big world superpower on our side"

I feel sorry for the majority of Jews too, who don't believe in Zionism. THere was a protest here in London where Jews went into the streets to protest against what is happening there in Israel.
You are right when you say world terrorism is no more palestinian, but still every other week on the BBC you are guaranteed to hear the phrases "Palestinian terrorist"..."Palestinian suicide bommer"...

I shouldn't polemicize the argument, I'm sorry about that.



Posted by: lolomarseille

PAWEL wrote:
"The difference between a commy and a social democrat is that the former just shoots you in the back of the head right away, but the latter tortures all your life - from the crib to the grave."

hi hi it's why i'm social democrat; much more efficient!

more seriously the worse ennemies of socdem were always the communist, always

less seriously, i know who is PAwel; is training for saturday night live revival, he plans to play the role of the neocons



Posted by: lolomarseille

well, same protest in marseille(50 000 jews in marseille, exodus came from marseille)
but the debate is getting harder, well jewish 3td community in the world outside israel is very divided
we"re not on the guardian talk, you will have hard answers to your post;;;



Posted by: mria

Quote:
Originally posted by lolomarseille

we"re not on the guardian talk, you will have hard answers to your post;;;


Ha ha. Its okay. I feel better already.



Posted by: lolomarseille

okay!
why not!
at least, america is land of freedom and freedom of speech, no?
so you're right, write that you think
:-))



Posted by: RobOhioGuy

Quote:
Originally posted by Jill
I acutally don''t find Michael Moore to be anti-American at all. I think he is trying to raise people's awareness of certain issues and generate debate on topics important to America.




He didn't change a movie into a documentary..... quite the opposite. He marketed a movie that is largely fictional and is attempting to present is as a documentary. He attempts to present his movie as a factual documentary..... it is a work of FICTION


Michael Moore is only pro america as long as you agree with his extreme socialist view of what he thinks it should be like. Moore is so far left Kerry would be too far right for him to support. Moore isnt interested in debate. He has an agenda and wants to see socialism as the form of government in the US. If you have ever heard him being interviewed you would know what Im talking about.... Im not talking about "sound bites" Im talking about indepth interviews. The man is a whacko



Posted by: RobOhioGuy

Quote:
Originally posted by parasionok
Pawel,

wait a minute. Are you aware that we are in the XXI century now? What does present Germany have to do with Marx, Engels, Hitler? It is history, mate Germany is a progressive liberal country now, Germany was one of the founder of EU. Excuse me, Pawel, but you should all stop living in the past and move on. You have to look at the present picture and present situation in Europe and in the world.


Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it!



Posted by: lolomarseille

true
even if it is marx quote



Posted by: mria

Quote:
Originally posted by lolomarseille
okay!
why not!
at least, america is land of freedom and freedom of speech, no?
so you're right, write that you think
:-))


Oh, Lolo. I am from Wales, lived in Russia, soon to move to Japan



Posted by: rob_we

mhmm guys
we talk about everything, but nothing really solid here. Ok for me now "proud" owner of the dvd and having seen the movie at last, lets talk about facts. What is actually fiction?

I try to state some topics:

1; The connection to the Bin Laden familiy as a Bush family tradition?

2; The sponsoring of George Bushs Company by arabs?

3; The Haliburton contracts?

4; The afghan pipline?

5; The senators who vote for things they haven´t even read?

6; The missing WMD and chemical weapons?

7; The missing link to Al Qaeda?

8; The scene in the kindergarden while the planes flew in the WTC?

9; The "off" day schedule of george W Bush?

Lets try to talk about those topics so we can form a kind of picture what is fiction and what maybe has some background?

any comments welcome...



Posted by: lolomarseille

Quote:
Originally posted by rob_we
mhmm guys
we talk about everything, but nothing really solid here. Ok for me now "proud" owner of the dvd and having seen the movie at last, lets talk about facts. What is actually fiction?

I try to state some topics:

1; The connection to the Bin Laden familiy as a Bush family
tradition?
WELL? TRADE IS GOOD FOR PEACE AMONG NATIONS
2; The sponsoring of George Bushs Company by arabs?
EVERYONE DID(SADDAM IS ARAB)

3; The Haliburton contracts?
AAAAH, JOKER

4; The afghan pipline?
HE DID NOT WORKED, AN ENGINNER'S DREAM

5; The senators who vote for things they haven´t even read?
THIS IS AN ATTACK AGAINST DEMOCRACY!

6; The missing WMD and chemical weapons?
UN WORKED, IT'S UNBELIEVABLE

7; The missing link to Al Qaeda?
WICH ONE?

8; The scene in the kindergarden while the planes flew in the WTC?
ALLWAYS PUT CHILDREN IN ADVERTISING

9; The "off" day schedule of george W Bush?
POOR GEORGE

Lets try to talk about those topics so we can form a kind of picture what is fiction and what maybe has some background?

any comments welcome...




Posted by: Jill

Quote:
Moore to shoot sequel to 'Fahrenheit'
Thursday, November 11, 2004 Posted: 1923 GMT (0323 HKT)

LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Michael Moore plans a follow-up to "Fahrenheit 9/11," his hit documentary that assails President Bush over the handling of the September 11 attacks and the war on terrorism, according to a Hollywood trade paper.

Moore told Daily Variety that he and Harvey Weinstein, the Miramax boss who produced the film, hope to have "Fahrenheit 9/11 1/2" ready in two to three years.

"Fifty-one percent of the American people lacked information (in this election) and we want to educate and enlighten them," Moore was quoted in Thursday's edition of Variety. "They weren't told the truth. We're communicators and it's up to us to start doing it now."

A spokesman for Fellowship Adventure Group, formed by Weinstein and brother Bob to help distribute "Fahrenheit 9/11," did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

"Fahrenheit 9/11," which won top honors at May's Cannes Film Festival, became the first documentary to top $100 million at the domestic box office. Moore, who won the documentary Academy Award for "Bowling for Columbine," is pushing "Fahrenheit 9/11" in the best-picture category for the upcoming Oscars.

The issues for the follow-up film will remain the same, Iraq and terrorism, Moore said.

"The official mourning period is over today and there is a silver lining: George W. Bush is prohibited by law from running again," Moore said.





Posted by: AkMike

"
"The official mourning period is over today and there is a silver lining: George W. Bush is prohibited by law from running again," Moore said."



"D But,,,, Brother Jeb is waiting in the wings!!!!
Bush Brothers Back to back!!!



Posted by: AkMike

LOL!



Posted by: AkMike

This is long post but it just might open some eyes..


Fahrenheit 9/11:
The temperature at which Michael Moore's pants burn
By Brendan Nyhan
July 2, 2004

Michael Moore's career as a rabble-rousing populist has been marked by a frequent pattern of dissembling and factual inaccuracy. He distorted the chronology of his first movie, "Roger & Me"; repeatedly peddled the myth that the Bush administration gave $43 million to the Taliban; published two books, Stupid White Men and Dude, Where's My Country?, that were riddled with factual errors and distortions; and won an Academy Award for "Bowling for Columbine," a documentary based on a confused and often contradictory argument that features altered footage of a Bush-Quayle campaign ad, a misleading presentation of a speech by National Rifle Association president Charlton Heston, and other factual distortions.

With his new documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11," which won the prestigious Palme D'Or at the Cannes Film Festival and was #1 at the US box office last week, Moore has surged to new prominence -- and come under increasing scrutiny. His staff has made much of elaborate fact-checking that was reportedly conducted on the film. And fortunately, it appears to be free of the silly and obvious errors that have plagued Moore's past work, such as the claim in Stupid White Men that the Pentagon planned to spend $250 billion on the Joint Strike Fighter in 2001, a sum that represented over 80 percent of the total defense budget request for the year.

However, "Fahrenheit 9/11" is filled with a series of deceptive half-truths and carefully phrased insinuations that Moore does not adequately back up. As Washington Monthly blogger Kevin Drum and others have noted, the irony is that these are the same tactics frequently used by the target of the film, George W. Bush. Moore and his chief antagonist have more in common than viewers might think.

The 2000 Florida recount

Reviewing the 2000 election during the opening of the film, Moore uses a quote from CNN legal commentator Jeffrey Toobin to make a deeply misleading suggestion about the results of the media recounts conducted in Florida:

Moore: And even if numerous independent investigations prove that Gore got the most votes --
Toobin: If there was a statewide recount, under every scenario, Gore won the election.
Moore: -- it won't matter just as long as all your daddy's friends on the Supreme Court vote the right way.
But the recount conducted by a consortium of media organizations found something quite different, as Newsday recently pointed out. If the statewide recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court had gone ahead, the consortium found that Bush would have won the election under two different scenarios: counting only "undervotes," or taking into account the reported intentions of some county electoral officials to include "overvotes" as well. During the CNN appearance from which Moore draws the clip, reporter Candy Crowley explained that Toobin's analysis assumed the statewide consideration of "overvotes," which was not a sure thing, though there are indications that Leon County Circuit Court judge Terry Lewis, who was supervising the recount, might have directed counties to consider them.

The Saudi flights

In another scene, Moore suggests that members of Osama Bin Laden's family and other Saudis were able to fly out of the country while air traffic was grounded after September 11. After an initial report in Newsweek inaccurately characterized the scene, saying it had made a direct claim to that effect, Moore's staff replied with a legalistic parsing. The film does accurately date the Saudi flights out of the country to "after September 13" as they claim (flights leaving the country resumed on the 14th), but Moore does not take the important step of explaining the meaning of this date in the film:

Moore: In the days following September 11, all commercial and private airline traffic was grounded... [video clips] Not even Ricky Martin could fly. But really, who wanted to fly? No one, except the Bin Ladens.
Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND): We had some airplanes authorized at the highest levels of our government to fly to pick up Osama Bin Laden's family members and others from Saudi Arabia and transport them out of this country.
Moore: It turns out that the White House approved planes to pick up the Bin Ladens and numerous other Saudis. At least six private jets and nearly two dozen commercial planes carried the Saudis and the Bin Ladens out of the US after September 13th. In all, 142 Saudis, including 24 members of the bin Laden family, were allowed to leave the country.
Given that Moore states that "In the days following September 11, all commercial and private airline traffic was grounded," how are viewers to know that this description did not include the Saudi flights out of the country? The "after September 13th" clause may show that Moore's claim was technically accurate, but it leaves viewers with the distinct impression that the Bin Ladens left the country before others were allowed to.

Saudi investments and business relationships

Moore also uses the power of insinuation to play on the relationship between the Bush family and the Bin Ladens. The facts are thin, but that doesn't stop him from making ominous suggestions about the connections between the two.

After discussing the September 11 attacks, Moore presents clips from an interview between Saudi Arabia's Prince Bandar and CNN's Larry King in which Bandar describes Osama Bin Laden as a "simple and very quiet guy." Moore then intones the following over video of Bush in a Florida classroom after being told of the second plane hitting the World Trade Center:

Hmm. A simple and quiet guy whose family who just happened to have a business relationship with the family of George W. Bush. Is that what he was thinking about? Because if the public knew this, it wouldn't look very good.
"Just happened" to have a business relationship? What does Moore mean? He doesn't say precisely, of course, but he draws a series of tenuous and often circumstantial links between Bin Laden family investments and Bush's actions as President.

For instance, Moore shows that the White House blacked out the name of another Texas Air National Guard pilot who was suspended along with Bush - James R. Bath - in service records released earlier this year. He suggests that the White House was not concerned about privacy and instead wanted to hide Bath's links to Bush:

Why didn't Bush want the press and the public to see Bath's name on his military records? Perhaps he was worried that the American people would find out that at one time James R. Bath was the Texas money manager for the Bin Ladens.
Moore notes that Bath was retained by Salem Bin Laden, and describes Bush's founding of the Arbusto oil company. James Moore, an author, appears next, saying in an interview that "there's no indication" Bush Sr. funded Arbusto and that the source of the firm's investments is unknown. Michael Moore then piles on the innuendo in his narration:

So where did George W. Bush get his money?... [archival clip of Bush saying "I'm George Bush"] One person who did invest in him was James R. Bath. Bush's good friend James Bath was hired by the Bin Laden family to manage its money in Texas and invest in businesses. And James Bath himself in turn invested in George W. Bush.
This phrasing suggests that Bath invested Bin Laden family money in Arbusto. But as Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball note in an online Newsweek column and Matt Labash points out in a Weekly Standard article on the film, Bath has stated this investment was his money, not the Bin Ladens'. Moore presents no evidence to the contrary.

The film also notes investments in United Defense, a military contractor, by the Carlyle Group, a firm that Bush and his father have been involved with which counts members of the Bin Laden family among its investors. He states:

September 11 guaranteed that United Defense was going to have a very good year. Just six weeks after 9/11, Carlyle filed to take United Defense public and in December, made a one-day profit of $237 million. But sadly, with so much attention focused on the Bin Laden family being important Carlyle investors, the Bin Ladens eventually had to withdraw.
Moore's phrasing suggests that the Bin Ladens profited from the post-Sept. 11 buildup with the United Defense IPO but were forced to withdraw after the stock sale. However, Labash notes that the Bin Ladens withdrew before the initial filing, not afterward, missing the big payday Moore insinuates that they received.

Finally, Moore drops a big number - $1.4 billion - claiming "That's how much the Saudi royals and their associates have given the Bush family, their friends and their related businesses in the past three decades," adding that "$1.4 billion doesn't just buy a lot of flights out of the country. It buys a lot of love." But Isikoff and Hosenball show that nearly 90% of that total comes from contracts awarded by the Saudi government to BDM, a defense contractor owned by Carlyle. But when the contracts were awarded and BDM received the Saudi funds, Bush Sr. had no official involvement with the firm, though he made one paid speech and took an overseas trip on its behalf. He didn't actually join Carlyle's Asian advisory board until after the firm had sold BDM. And though George W. Bush had previously served on the board of another Carlyle company, he left it before BDM received the first Saudi contract. As usual, the connections are loose and circumstantial at best.

Afghanistan/Iraq/homeland security motives

Moore also offers a number of suggestions that the Bush administration's military actions abroad and efforts to increase homeland security were motivated by nefarious hidden agendas.

For instance, here is his description of the US campaign against the Taliban government of Afghanistan:

The United States began bombing Afghanistan just four weeks after 9/11. Mr. Bush said he was doing so because the Taliban government of Afghanistan had been harboring Bin Laden... [montage of clips of Bush saying the US would "smoke out" Bin Laden] For all his tough talk, Bush really didn't do much.
Moore then shows former counterterrorism advisor Richard Clarke criticizing the war, saying it took two months for US special forces to be deployed in the area of Afghanistan where Bin Laden was hiding. This fact is portrayed as an indication of a hidden motive:

Two months? A mass murderer who attacked the United States was given a two-month head start? Who in their right mind would do that?... [clip of Bush] Or was the war in Afghanistan really about something else? Perhaps the answer was in Houston, Texas.
Moore proceeds with the heavy-handed narrative, suggesting he is unraveling the alleged hidden story of the US war in Afghanistan through a series of loose juxtapositions:

In 1997, while George W. Bush was governor of Texas, a delegation of Taliban leaders from Afghanistan flew to Houston to meet with Unocal executives to discuss the building of a pipeline through Afghanistan bringing natural gas from the Caspian Sea. And who got a Caspian Sea drilling contract the same day Unocal signed the pipeline deal? A company headed by a man named Dick Cheney: Halliburton.
[clips of Bush and Cheney talking about Halliburton from 2000]
And who else stood to benefit from the pipeline? Bush's #1 campaign contributor: Kenneth Lay and the good people of Enron. Only the British press covered this trip.
Contrary's to Moore's implication, the fact that Bush was governor of Texas at the time of the Taliban/Unocal meeting does nothing to prove that he was somehow involved in the meeting. Governors are obviously not responsible for every business dealing that takes place in their state. Nonetheless, Moore slips his name in to link him to the deal.

The filmmaker continues his narration by directly linking the 1997 deal with a 2001 visit to the US by a Taliban envoy:

Then, in 2001, just five and a half months before 9/11, the Bush administration welcomed a special Taliban envoy to tour the United States and help improve the image of the Taliban government.
[clip of envoy press conference]
Here is the Taliban official visiting our State Department to meet with US officials. Why on earth would the Bush administration allow a Taliban leader to visit the United States knowing that the Taliban were harboring the man who bombed the USS Cole and our African embassies? Well, I guess 9/11 put a stop to that.
This rhetorical question is entirely disingenuous. Moore suggests that the US was indifferent to the Taliban's harboring of Bin Laden, but Isikoff and Hosenball point out that the administration met with the envoy in part to discuss the fate of Bin Laden, who they were pressing the Taliban to turn over.

Moore then implies that the war was really a front for Unocal to create a pipeline:

When the invasion of Afghanistan was complete, we installed its new president, Hamid Karzai. Who was Hamid Karzai? He was a former advisor to Unocal. Bush also appointed as our envoy to Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad, who was also a former Unocal advisor. I guess you can probably see where this is leading. Faster than you can say black gold Texas tea, Afghanistan signed an agreement with her neighboring countries to build a pipeline through Afghanistan carrying natural gas from the Caspian Sea.
But as Ken Silverstein wrote in The American Prospect back in 2002 and Isikoff and Hosenball show in their article about "Fahrenheit," Unocal dropped support for the pipeline in 1998 (the company has issued a press release making this point). In 2002, Afghanistan did sign the agreement Moore described, but Unocal is not involved in the project, which is still in its planning stages and may never come to fruition.

Later, Moore presents a series of anecdotal examples of what he sees as misguided efforts to improve homeland security: FBI questioning of a man who made derogatory statements about President Bush at a gym, infiltration of a peace group in Fresno by a sheriff's detective on an anti-terrorism task force, a mother who was forced to drink her breast milk during an airport security screening to prove that it was not a toxic substance, and the decision to allow airline passengers to carry lighters and matches onto planes while banning other items. Again, based on this flimsy collection of evidence, Moore suggests a hidden motive:

Ok, let me see if I got this straight. Old guys in the gym - bad. Peace groups in Fresno - bad. Breast milk - really bad. But matches and lighters on a plane - hey, no problem. Was this really about our safety? Or was something else going on?
He then shows a series of clips arguing that Oregon state troopers are underfunded and have little manpower. Without making any argument about how this relates to the rest of the country or the federal government's actions, Moore jumps right into more implications of conspiracy and nefarious motives, keying off a trooper's wish for a manual on how to catch terrorists:

Of course, the Bush administration didn't hand out a manual on how to deal with the terrorist threat because the terrorist threat wasn't what this was all about. They just wanted us to be fearful enough so that we'd get behind what their real plan was.
Again, Moore's meaning when he says "what this was all about" is unclear, but it appears to be a reference to the emphasis on homeland security after September 11. "Their real plan" is, as the movie later makes clear, a reference to the war in Iraq. But regardless of any previous plans to invade Iraq, the argument makes no sense. The breast milk example, for instance, indicates an overzealous devotion to homeland security, not indifference to it. And Oregon's state budgetary woes are hardly proof that the federal government's homeland security effort was insincere.

Ashcroft and the FBI

In his discussion of homeland security, Moore takes a cheap shot at John Ashcroft, stating, "In 2000, he was running for re-election as Senator from Missouri against a man who died the month before the election. The voters preferred the dead guy." Of course, the governor of Missouri who succeeded Mel Carnahan, the so-called "dead guy," had promised to appoint Jean Carnahan, the governor's widow, to the Senate if her late husband won the election, a fact voters clearly understood.

On a more serious note, after suggesting that Ashcroft was unconcerned about terrorism before September 11, Moore uses phrasing that exaggerates how widespread knowledge of the Al Qaeda plot was before the attacks inside the FBI and Justice Department:

[Ashcroft's] own FBI knew that summer that there were Al Qaeda members in the US and that Bin Laden was sending his agents to flight schools around the country. But Ashcroft's Justice Department turned a blind eye and a deaf ear.
This implies far more prior knowledge about flight school activity than actually existed. As the 9/11 Commission found in a staff statement (72K Adobe PDF), the so-called "Phoenix memo" from an FBI agent in Arizona suggesting a possible effort by Bin Laden to send agents to flight schools was not widely circulated within the FBI and did not reach Ashcroft's desk:

His memo was forwarded to one field office. Managers of the Osama Bin Laden unit and the Radical Fundamentalist unit at FBI headquarters were addressees, but did not even see the memo until after September 11. No managers at headquarters saw the memo before September 11. The New York field office took no action. It was not shared outside the FBI.
Before Sept. 11, the Minneapolis FBI also investigated Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker, who was enrolled in a flight school there, but no Al Qaeda connections were discovered until after the attacks. Again, saying the FBI "knew" of a plot to send agents to flight schools is overstated.

"You can't refute what's said in the film"

During a recent interview on "Late Show with David Letterman," the host identified the problems with the circumstantial argument of the film in a series of probing questions to Moore:

When you look at the film in total, are there things there - if I were smarter, could I refute some of these points? Shall I believe you that everything means exactly what it looks like? I mean, the presentation is overwhelming, but could a smarter man than me come in and say, "Yes, this happened, but it means nothing," "Yes, that happened but it means nothing"? But put together in a puzzle it creates one inarguable, compelling circumstance.
Moore's response to Letterman (after a joking aside) sums up the problem with his work. Despite proclamations that the film is satirical and represents his opinion, Moore still makes strong claims about its veracity:

You can't refute what's said in the film. It's all there, the facts are all there, the footage is all there.
Sadly, as with most of Moore's work, this is simply not true.



Posted by: lolomarseille

i dislike mikael moore; cannes palm to him was a scandal
btw, it's not my concern but yours
so if you feel guilty and want to act like an attorney it's your pb, not mine
i'm more intersted on ukraine and russia than on your periodic civil wars as said ambassador Sultan



Posted by: lolomarseille

<http://www.andyfoulds.co.uk/amusement/bushv2.htm>



Russian America Top. Рейтинг ресурсов Русской Америки. Рейтинг@Mail.ru Russian Network USA



Russian Meeting Place Copyright ©2000 - 2008, www.russianmeetingplace.com and Khahsyar and Lena.