|
Originally Posted by Subtitle-D
Reality has hit and I feel GUTTED. Now I have realised that 43 is too old for me, because I have never had any children, and by the time we had got together she would be in mid-forties – maybe too late to have children. I would do better with someone a few years younger than me. Only problem is I am GUTTED, as I was bowled over by this lady’s photos, and I felt in my bones something genuine, the first time in 3 years since splitting with my ex-girlfriend. I feel ill. I wanted SO much to telephone her, but knew there was no point.
I have just spent my whole summer studying for a computer qualification (Cisco CCNA) in case anybody’s heard of it, to improve my career prospects, (I work as a cabbie just now) and I wouldn’t even hardly chat to a girl if I had the chance as I wanted to focus on this and get it finished – no time for dating - sad. Yet there is still no sign of that elusive ‘job’ opportunity – is it worth it? One other RW I met on Elena’s Models replied to me only to ask in very puzzled tones ‘why you the taxi-driver when you have the good education?…’, and I felt I had no good answer. It’s a tough life. Career matters too, and having a settled job you like is a big plus in life. For me that is hard to find… Anybody else get bogged down by such conflicts ? |
|
Originally Posted by Subtitle-D
Err, unless I am imagining things many people have children in their 30's and 40's nowadays - quite common. My own parents were 40 when I was born in the year 1966. Apparently studies have shown children born to older parents do much better in school, so its not all bad to be an older parent.
I did specify I wanted my own family in my ad, but I also said a maximum age of 39, so I broke my own rules I guess. She said she would have children if it was with the right man. Best regards, and thanks again for all replies. |
|
Originally Posted by Chrismc
There are a number of positive aspects to having a first child in midlife. There are also some drawbacks. First, the positives:
A new parent who is between 35 and 40 years of age has about 15 to 20 years of adult life experence and so has more inner resources to draw on in times of stress than does a younger parent. Middle-aged parents are usually at the height of their earning power, so they have more financial stability to support a child. Having had many experiences, many middle-aged adults are ready to be parents. They have a sense of identity -- the child will not have to provide them with it. Having a first child in midlife provides a real sense of renewal. Adults in midlife may have a deeper sense of the value of life itself, and so tend to place high value on the time they can spend with their children. While many of the positive things about having a baby in midlife involve the joys of raising a small child, the drawbacks have mostly to do with the future and with the parents' concerns about aging: Older parents may have lower energy levels. They may wonder if they will have the energy to be as active as their child needs them to be. They wonder if they will live to see their child become an adult. Will they ever see their grandchildren? Will they very quickly become a burden to a child just as he is trying to get on his feet as a young adult? When the age difference is 40 or more years, quite a schism is created; parents worry whether their values will be at all relevant to their child. The age difference may be particularly apparent when a child becomes a teenager -- a difficult period for even young parents to deal with. Another consideration when having children later in life is the possibility of having siblings with large age differences Chris |

it's not popular advice.
but then who's gonna play ball with your son etc etc. If you thought this over and still are planning on kids it's best if the girl is in what formerly was called 'childbearing age'.
Conservative..
|
Originally Posted by yoron
I agree goforit. The best way to have a kid is when you're both are young
![]() There is no easy way around this fact. It's medical, not a opinion. Both quality of semen and physiological factors combines to this. But in our modern society where most everyone has a career to be done before (youknowwhat it's not popular advice. |
On the other hand, you can have kids later too if you like and most likely it will be healthy but then who's gonna play ball with your son etc etc. If you thought this over and still are planning on kids it's best if the girl is in what formerly was called 'childbearing age'.Yeah i know Conservative..
|
|
Originally Posted by Subtitle-D
Yes, kimchik, maybe I should start smoking some 'pot', to haze out all those rough edges !! Oh, they just don't allow it here. Are they allowed to smoke it in Russia ?
|

|
Originally Posted by stuckmojo
I'm not really qualified to say much about the age/children thing, having just turned 31 last month and not having any kids of my own...but surely....
if you want kids, and sincerely intend to give them the kind of life that you feel children the world over should have a right to, what the f**k does it matter how old you are?? I would personally rather have a dad that is 40 years older than me, who I know was/is there, rather than one who is 20 years older than me, and an absolute c**k. You do what you feel, and if anyone ever says, "your too old to do this/that/whatever"....then personally I would suggest quite a pointed reply, or quite a pointed stick, depending on who's watching.. ![]() Peace!! |

|
Originally Posted by Jutman
Chris
Try let her get the 3 posts and maybe she will enter the russian forum. Or inform her about online translation help. BR Jutman |

|
Originally Posted by Chrismc
Guys
Do you realise what this guy/girl is saying and who she is talking about, is it someone causing problems or is she the real deal??? The messages are a bit cryptic, but I know who it could be, I think one of you mods had better do some checking before this goes to far. Very odd ![]() Chris |
Russian Meeting Place Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
www.russianmeetingplace.com and Khahsyar and Lena.