|
Originally Posted by kartoshka
Hi everybody!
I have a question, which is not related to relationship. I am a student now in one institute and plan to work in few years. My husband earns good income, but he isn't going to share with me his income when I'll be working (he financially supports me only now while I am a student). He pays 30% tax + 8+4% (we are living in New York). I was recently told that even if I will be earning average income I will be paying as big Taxes as my husband pays. Is there any way to prove that I don't participate in spending his income and to pay less income for my future salary? Hope somebody knows the advice Thanks kartoshka |

|
Originally Posted by Texas Proud
Man... I am in a hole and all I do is keep digging.. WHY??????
First, Kartoshka... welcome to the board... please do not get offended with this question... but why would your husband NOT want to support you??? You are married are you not?? But, to your question.. you will not have to pay his high rates, but you will be paying higher rates than if you were single... you do not get all the same deductions and your tax brackets are closer (ie, you pay the higher rate sooner).. so, you will be paying big taxes... Now, I do not know about the NY taxes.. I was lucky and my company paid them.. and since I am single I did not have to worry about a spouse income... but I think you will pay a pretty penny there also.. |
|
Originally Posted by swindoom
I find it a lttle strange you talk about "his" money and "your" money. When my wife first moved to England I explained that the money I was payed was "our" money, not "my" money, we are a family and we share everything, it is "our" home, "our" car etc..
Now she has a job , her pay is paid into our joint account and even though my pay is about 6 times hers she still understands it is "our" money in "our" joint account. I do not keep track of what she spends but for major purchases we discuss things, such as we need a new fridge/freezer we have talked about the maximum we will spend, next we will visit the shop together and decide which one "we" want, then find it cheaper on the internet. I always thought a marriage was meant to be a partnership not a takeover. |
|
Originally Posted by j_c
Swindoom
No,no,no,no,no.....you may think this, but really , your money is hers, and her money is hers!!!lol Regards JC |
|
Originally Posted by Texas Proud
I do not know what state you live.. but I do not think it matters... because I think it is federal laws this next statement resides... Your husband can not leave his retirement savings to his children... by law, (and know that I am NOT a lawer, so you get what you pay for here.. which means go research on your own)... but, by law when you get married, the wife is automatically the beneficiary unless SHE SIGNS away her right to receive them.. as long as you do not sign anything.. you would get them if he unfortunately dies.... |
|
Originally Posted by Texas Proud
Another thing... if he is not careful, and he moves assets back and forth between marrital assets and the trust, you can make a claim on the trust... so, agree to pay the mortgage on the apartment and then you have established that connection.... sneaky, but he seems to want to be also... |
|
Originally Posted by kartoshka
but when I told him about that, he answered that he expects me to help him to pay morgage for apartment (for apartment which I am not owner, and which belong to his trust, which will be divided between only his daughether and out future children), or he expects me to spend 3/4 of my future salary on our family...
|
|
Originally Posted by NO_MERCY
Are we talking about SS or other retirement funds? I am not sure, but I have heard something about some sort of seniority between the ex-wife and a recent wife. I dont exactly remember what it is, but it was about whose marriage lasted longer.. I am not sure. |
Russian Meeting Place Copyright ©2000 - 2008,
www.russianmeetingplace.com and Khahsyar and Lena.