|
Sexual Attitudes of Russians (Russia and Sex) |
Russia
Sexual Attitudes
In the 1990s, Russian sexual values and attitudes generally moved toward
liberalization and autonomy, with distinct differences according to age,
sex, region, and level of education. In the Soviet era, the Russian
attitude toward sexuality itself paralleled that toward artistic
expression of the erotic: it simply was concealed. Most Soviet
philosophical, psychological, and biological reference works made little
or no mention of sexuality as a major characteristic of human beings.
Soviet psychology, notoriously backward and misused, ignored almost
completely the influence of sexual behavior and motivation on overall
psychological makeup.
After decades of Stalinist repression, Russian erotic art, literature, and
theater began a gradual revival in the 1970s as censorship and ideological
control weakened somewhat. Access to Western novels with erotic motifs,
such as Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer and Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita ,
also improved in this period. In 1992 restrictions on the publication of
erotic literature were loosened in Russia, heralding a rapid output of
erotic and pornographic material of all sorts. A collection of children's
erotic folklore was prepared in 1995, and erotic film festivals and
photography exhibits began to appear in the 1990s. The public seemingly
has accepted the frequent use of nudity in Russian television, dance, and
drama.
Especially in film and literature, the shift has produced many instances
of gratuitous or cruel sex and arbitrarily introduced nudity. Violence
against women frequently is a central motif of movies, and violence and
sex often are linked. Russian observers have expressed alarm that the
release of long-repressed sexual expression in art will be accompanied by
a similar deluge of sex and violence in Russian society. Indeed, the
incidence of violence and sexual attacks against women in the first half
of the 1990s seems to confirm these fears (see The Role of Women, this ch.).
Objections to the trend toward sexual liberation are concentrated in the
older generations. In surveys younger and better-educated Russians
generally voice approval, and new enterprises selling cosmetics,
high-fashion clothing, and health products play to a new public interest
in attractive display of the human body. The individuality implicit in
such marketing--and especially obvious in the new Russian youth
culture--is a drastic change from the strict standards of dress and
grooming imposed in the Soviet era. The wearing of shorts, for example,
only was accepted in Russia in the 1980s; in the Soviet era, women could
not wear trousers in public without harassment or arrest; and vigilantes
often forcibly cut the hair of youths who exceeded the standard for hair
length.
According to surveys taken in the early 1990s, most Russians feel that
romantic love is a precondition to marriage and to sexual intimacy. But
there are great differences in attitude toward this ideal between the
older and younger generations, between the sexes, and between rural and
urban Russians. Russians in larger cities tend to take a more liberal
outlook on premarital sex. The younger generations in Russia show a much
more casual attitude toward commitment to a long-term relationship than do
the older generations. However, in surveys younger males showed a much
stronger identification of sex with pleasure, and younger females a
stronger identification of sex with love. Russians' attitudes toward
premarital sex became somewhat more liberal in the 1990s; in a 1993
survey, the percentage of those disapproving was substantially lower than
it had been in previous years.
The official policy of the Soviet Union toward homosexuality was one of
persecution and intimidation. Until the late 1980s, Russian social
scientists and society in general were completely silent on the subject.
Under those conditions, homosexuals, known as "blues," lived in an
underground culture circumscribed by the brutality of gangs and the police
and by employment discrimination.
With the advent of glasnost and the appearance of acquired immune
deficiency syndrome (AIDS) in the Soviet Union, open scientific and
journalistic discussion of homosexuality began in 1987. The issue became
politicized in 1990 as gays and lesbians began attacking discrimination as
a human rights issue. At this point, strong arguments appeared for
abolishing Article 121 of the Criminal Code, which stipulated that sex
between men (but not between women) was a crime. Despite increasingly
strong opinion against Article 121, in the early 1990s nationalists and
communists joined some religious organizations in opposing
decriminalization. Meanwhile, the number of convictions under Article 121
decreased steadily. Although Russia's new Criminal Code had not been
ratified as of mid-1996, substantial modifications had been made to
Article 121 by that time.
Hundreds of gay rights organizations appeared in Russia in the 1990s,
mostly in urban centers. Moscow became the center of Russia's gay and
lesbian communities, both of which remained substantially less overt than
their Western equivalents. Despite a gradual increase in public tolerance
in the 1990s, substantial residues of homophobia remain in Russian
society. The neofascist group Pamyat', for example, remained violently
antigay in the mid-1990s, and the communist and extreme nationalist media
have launched strident homophobic attacks. In the late 1980s and early
1990s, numerous surveys identified homosexuals as the most hated group in
Russian society, although the number of Russians calling for their
extermination or isolation decreased noticeably between 1989 and the
mid-1990s.
Education
In the Soviet period, education was highly centralized, and indoctrination in
Marxist-Leninist theory was a major element of every school's curriculum. The
schools' additional ideological function left a legacy in the post-Soviet system
that has proved difficult for educators to overcome. In the 1990s, reform
programs are aimed at overhauling the Soviet-era pedagogical philosophy and
substantially revising curricula. Inadequate funding has frustrated attainment
of these goals, however, and the teaching profession has lost talented
individuals because of low pay.
Data as of July 1996
(information from the U.S. Government)
*(You can find much more in-depth information about Russia, and helpful advice from Lena, Khashyar and others in the Russian Meeting Place's active Russian-Western Discussion Forums)
Click above to enter the Russian Meeting Place Discussion Forums, a popular and diverse community of members from all over the world who share experiences and discuss topics about Russia, Russian Culture, and Russian-Western relationships.
|
Help Support the Russian Meeting Place: Lena and Khashyar have created the Russian Meeting Place website as a service and with the intention of benefiting others. If you find that these articles and information on this website have been helpful to you, then you may, if you wish, make a tax-deductible donation of any amount to help us bring more helpful information to others and further the work of the Russian Meeting Place. Donations do not go to Khashyar and Lena, but to the support the work of the website. Thank you. Read more about making a tax-deductible donation here: |